Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Einstein divided by zero
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 15:53:31 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <57f8a7b526e55ca2ea2bf4b2eb227f05@www.novabbs.com>
References: <0d509b1635259917c7b4407251adcf31@www.novabbs.com> <3a42db544af628ec3969d6b80f1122b7@www.novabbs.com> <e613885e553df4e05738929b0c9eb9a9@www.novabbs.com> <99a0b6f82daafa4c7f7db42b177c6415@www.novabbs.com> <lvu43oF8kd9U1@mid.individual.net> <bfecab41294ec2664e5b98a423857d6d@www.novabbs.com> <m00mahFl6r3U2@mid.individual.net> <3795f1661821b0b6cb79fd4fbbc09035@www.novabbs.com> <m03i16F4mobU4@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2043238"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$PjFE5.CP2xqqtXHSWcGHeujQETZRYSyZu9WI1gi82knxCSqdKbgoe
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010
Bytes: 5059
Lines: 103

On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 9:04:46 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

> Am Donnerstag000030, 30.01.2025 um 08:39 schrieb Bertietaylor:
>> On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 6:59:34 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>
>>> Am Mittwoch000029, 29.01.2025 um 17:06 schrieb Bertietaylor:
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regarding GR, it started to mumble shit about quantum spacetime and
>>>>>> Planck's lengths and times, to later accept that IT'S BELIEVED that GR
>>>>>> has to have a role in atom's behavior, but immediately it added that
>>>>>> such area is under heavy study by several researches, and that such
>>>>>> influence of GR on atom's behavior IS FAR FROM BEING KNOWN BY NOW.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, added that efforts to incorporate quantum spacetime in atomic
>>>>>> theory have been made in the last decades without results (string
>>>>>> theory, quantum loop gravity, etc.). Additionally, added that a
>>>>>> completely new theory is needed, but there are no indications that
>>>>>> current proposals are going to succeed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, how about my own idea?
>>>>>
>>>>> It isn't that new anymore, but aims to fill that gap and base particles
>>>>> on spacetime of GR.
>>>>
>>>> Just forget the depravity of all relativity.
>>>>>
>>>>> The concept is therefore called 'stractured spacetime', where 'timelike
>>>>> stable patterns' are, what we call 'matter'.
>>>>
>>>> Matter is charge - electrons orbiting protons or getting stuck to
>>>> protons.
>>>
>>>
>>> This is 'materialism' (also known as 'particle concept').
>>
>> Not necessarily. Charges are force generating entities composed from
>> aether. We are all composed of charges moving through infinitely fine
>> aether in an infinite universe. Dreamy but explains all.
>>>
>>> I wanted to prove, that matter is actually not materialistic, but is
>>> build from imaterial 'structures'.
>>
>> Charge is built from aether, a material solid.
>>>
>>> As 'proof of concept' I used 'Growing Earth'.
>>>
>>> This goes like this:
>>>
>>> if the Earth would grow from within, we can be certain, that the
>>> particle concept must be wrong, because there can't be enough particles
>>> inside of this planet to make it grow from within.
>>
>> Well a charge can be approximated as a particle for kinetic effects.
>>>
>>> But if matter is actually 'relative', the Earth could grow, we could use
>>> 'spacetime of GR' as replacement for 'aether' and all are happy.
>>
>> Just throw out all the wrong, stupid, evil, vile, ridiculous, shameless
>> and unscientific SR and GR shit.
>
> this simply not true.
>
> I assume, that GR is correct, but do not really deal with GR.
>
> E.g. I regard the validity of the existence of spacetime of GR as an
> axiom.
>
> But I made no attempts to prove this and also made not attempts to find
> out, what spacetime actually is.
>
> About Einstein's 'On the electrydynamics of moving bodies' I have
> written many longish articles and explained, that it is full of errors.
>
> E.g. I found a new and very obvious an dcritical error here:
>
> See page six, rougly in the middle:
>
> There we find an equation, which says this:
>
> ∂τ/∂y= 0
>
> Now, 'tau' is the time of the moving system k.
>
> This system k moves along the x-axis of system K with velocity v, while
> x- and xsi-axis coincide and etha- and y axis remain parallel.
>
> In other words v_y is permanently zero, or: ∂y=0.
>
> So we have a 'divide by zero' case.
>
> ∂τ/∂y could approach a value, however, but if v_y goes to zero, the
> quotient ∂τ/∂y would go to infinity and NOT to zero (as the equation
> says).
>
> Iow: this equation (∂τ/∂y= 0) is wrong!

It shows that tau is a constant as stated.
>
> TH
>
>
> ....