| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<57fc7a531e144255fd65fef4de4b6939@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Relativity claims to have proven that parallel lines meet. Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 22:11:30 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <57fc7a531e144255fd65fef4de4b6939@www.novabbs.com> References: <00939c17919600807e3ad6527b47e74d@www.novabbs.com> <8e4d47b49b0d08a32c4d241a7bd9f85c@www.novabbs.com> <8239f101b00cd6e1c3ea8ce54ff2cdea@www.novabbs.com> <63f8f9ebfa2f689e759d32b9165ef3bc@www.novabbs.com> <tRQTVGzF_19UrZ-N-ehKIlp9bFM@jntp> <67900f0d$0$408$426a34cc@news.free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="510980"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$wMo02S0HD9wQ7pSbptRJouRs9LIsPY9DB3D0.Rcq55pKXFJCGe1q. X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180 Bytes: 2592 Lines: 32 On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 21:18:06 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Python <jp@python.invalid> wrote: > >> Le 21/01/2025 à 19:18, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit >> : >>> On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 23:27:27 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 21:30:17 +0000, ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 17:26:08 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> This is necessary because it claims to have proven the doubling of the >>>>>> Newtonian deflection, which involves curved space and parallel lines >>>>>> meeting. >>>>> >>>>> You really don't understand any of this. >>>> My criticism of relativity at the top of this thread proves I understand >>>> it exactly and have disproven the derivation of the deflection of light >>>> as twice Newtonian. >>> None of you have shown you even comprehended the criticism. Many people >>> read this forum who don't participate, and you will persuade none. You >>> are unable to engage in reasoned debate about this criticism. >> >> Did you notice you are talking to yourself, "Laurence". You forgot to >> change your account settings :-P > > Nothing special, many nutters do that. > It's part of the symptoms, > > Jan Then all you need to do is double the gravitational force for double the curving of the path. Where does relativity get twice the force?