Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<57i93j9ok8kvltaghapl7ol0c6tom7j3da@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: LGBT Character Representation On TV Decreases Again, Per GLAAD Report
Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 07:23:10 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <57i93j9ok8kvltaghapl7ol0c6tom7j3da@4ax.com>
References: <v0tgah$36cfb$1@dont-email.me> <1rc63jdcf4gagcvgt4f2tflqo21u7koe9h@4ax.com> <v0vt9l$3qemd$7@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 13:23:11 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e54f4bbd5602710f1afca459fdbfb9ac";
	logging-data="538305"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+6GbBEBER1l3pPbiDySjN/4/HB5hMXGHY="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mZSB5b1MsAVio1038nT5RiwQPP0=
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 240503-0, 5/2/2024), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846
Bytes: 2519

On Thu, 02 May 2024 04:30:43 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
wrote:

>lcraver@home.ca wrote:
>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>>>GLAAD president and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis said networks should continue to 
>>>cast LGBT characters.
>>>
>>>“We know that LGBTQ-inclusive series can indeed be successful, as 
>>>demonstrated by shows like ‘The Last of Us’ and ‘Yellowjackets,’” Ellis 
>>>said in response to the findings. “We know it is imperative for the queer 
>>>community, especially transgender people, to see our lives reflected on 
>>>screen to counteract the misinformation and harmful rhetoric going 
>>>unchecked by politicians and journalists. And we know that younger 
>>>audiences are hungry for shows that truly reflect the world around them.”
>>
>>So stupid question but how many series period are represented in their
>>statistics vs last year? I mean if there are fewer shows it's not
>>shocking there would be less characters of ANY sexual preference
>>assuming all shows this year have the same number of characters as
>>those last year which I agree is  an assumption but I don't see
>>anything suggesting there are on average fewer characters per show
>>this year over past years...
>
>I susepct they make the numbers up to support their premise.

And in other news, libs complain that child molesters are
underrepresented on TV....