Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <587af89cb8bce31187ce8b3e81007d52@www.novabbs.com>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<587af89cb8bce31187ce8b3e81007d52@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: the notion of counter-intuitiveness in relativistic physics
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 17:42:06 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <587af89cb8bce31187ce8b3e81007d52@www.novabbs.com>
References: <GBEGTHyJnMpjHuJ0IoZO0OLSc1M@jntp> <43ee5c178f7ae877c0c3e00e77386494@www.novabbs.com> <xHQxwI0qFFk4RXIOP_V9qQEYF6o@jntp> <03be6498d21bfde3edbac3669f10841c@www.novabbs.com> <jAzCAJq8FVCKps9bXn3yDr5Sh4U@jntp> <e6a7e71e31958ad0eec9f8b0555d03bf@www.novabbs.com> <h2AZmvcBZlMRhA47eIHkP9jDtT4@jntp> <97b33fc8fbf96960076de44282d1b9bb@www.novabbs.com> <oPKXQ8bsC3abgQuCEc_SyKUFBE0@jntp> <f4ca34c2b3812ffb7f43aa6a05557d64@www.novabbs.com> <wDBp4COHjeQSyBgdVqBdHrF9rtY@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2223901"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$stwQue3mhAJPxzHJkQoBpui0tGvyI5jNSHP9FjolBPumXKyVoA8aG
Bytes: 2030
Lines: 20

On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 14:30:49 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:

> Le 11/08/2024 à 15:16, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
>> On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 7:29:31 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
>
>> Then you should write it U.cosu, not cosu.U.
>
> ? ? ?
>
> R.H.

Sorry, I thought I was being obvious.

When you write cosu.U, it can be taken either as
cos(u.U) or cos(u)U.  Writing as Ucosu removes
the ambiguity, mostly, but it's probably best to
use parentheses.  Remember PEMDAS: evaluate
what's inside parentheses first, then exponents,
then multiplication, division, addition then
subtraction.  The mnemonic is Please Excuse My
Dear Aunt Sally.