Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<593b99e8aa1601c24e96355bddd1dc53@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: minforth@gmx.net (minforth)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: Stack vs stackless operation
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:23:03 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <593b99e8aa1601c24e96355bddd1dc53@www.novabbs.com>
References: <591e7bf58ebb1f90bd34fba20c730b83@www.novabbs.com> <ed682d52512c43c6697c16dede02ebfad9a74ad8@i2pn2.org> <0549fc7874a0e47c7da5715b99b89b1c@www.novabbs.com> <39a0c814f009109f8dd77f80ed368963b0940ea2@i2pn2.org> <a81ac9ee2ed92686e940a55bed9d4dfb@www.novabbs.com> <31411d642d8bfec0ac894889780f2e6fe679ee9a@i2pn2.org> <173ea3e5ad162fc5d4a14d27b5d5d37e@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1861326"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="BZ29EnRIXfdX99fE+pfHgueF2xuF1KvSpLJsfuOZy3Y";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 0338a3da6f3e9c9f1401b365bcd9c3ed8de2227a
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$lXD8XJ4qA1iDgogp9p0edOk9OSdAW93xQO3ELBhMp6UYT6TSFbUNe
Bytes: 1856
Lines: 15

On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 9:08:19 +0000, LIT wrote:

>> I remain skeptical of such optimizations.  Not even twice the
>> performance
>> and the hope it represents a bottle-neck in order to realize that gain.
>
> I've got a feeling it would have more
> of a significance in 8088 era, say IBM 5150
> or XTs. 486 is already "too good" probably
> to see as much as 50% gain.
> I've got working XT board - if I manage to
> get at least FDD interface for that (no,
> not today... it'll take some time) I'll
> do some more testing.

Save yourself the time: use an emulator eg PCem, DOSBox(X) or QEMU