| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<593b99e8aa1601c24e96355bddd1dc53@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: minforth@gmx.net (minforth) Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Stack vs stackless operation Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:23:03 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <593b99e8aa1601c24e96355bddd1dc53@www.novabbs.com> References: <591e7bf58ebb1f90bd34fba20c730b83@www.novabbs.com> <ed682d52512c43c6697c16dede02ebfad9a74ad8@i2pn2.org> <0549fc7874a0e47c7da5715b99b89b1c@www.novabbs.com> <39a0c814f009109f8dd77f80ed368963b0940ea2@i2pn2.org> <a81ac9ee2ed92686e940a55bed9d4dfb@www.novabbs.com> <31411d642d8bfec0ac894889780f2e6fe679ee9a@i2pn2.org> <173ea3e5ad162fc5d4a14d27b5d5d37e@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1861326"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="BZ29EnRIXfdX99fE+pfHgueF2xuF1KvSpLJsfuOZy3Y"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: 0338a3da6f3e9c9f1401b365bcd9c3ed8de2227a X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$lXD8XJ4qA1iDgogp9p0edOk9OSdAW93xQO3ELBhMp6UYT6TSFbUNe Bytes: 1856 Lines: 15 On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 9:08:19 +0000, LIT wrote: >> I remain skeptical of such optimizations. Not even twice the >> performance >> and the hope it represents a bottle-neck in order to realize that gain. > > I've got a feeling it would have more > of a significance in 8088 era, say IBM 5150 > or XTs. 486 is already "too good" probably > to see as much as 50% gain. > I've got working XT board - if I manage to > get at least FDD interface for that (no, > not today... it'll take some time) I'll > do some more testing. Save yourself the time: use an emulator eg PCem, DOSBox(X) or QEMU