Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Olcott seems to be
 willfully ignorant
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:18:55 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <5a0adcfe00a221f0a8c3137705f1c52f68171964@i2pn2.org>
References: <v5vkun$1b0k9$1@dont-email.me> <v60dci$1ib5p$1@dont-email.me>
 <v60red$1kr1q$2@dont-email.me> <v61hn7$1oec9$1@dont-email.me>
 <v61ipa$1og2o$2@dont-email.me> <v61jod$1oec9$2@dont-email.me>
 <v61leu$1p1uo$1@dont-email.me>
 <7b6a00827bfcc84e99e19a0d0ae6028ebcdc263c@i2pn2.org>
 <v620vu$1qutj$2@dont-email.me>
 <f6e8f5de9a1e61c7970a92145ce8c1f9087ba431@i2pn2.org>
 <v628ts$1s632$1@dont-email.me>
 <178edf6a7c5329df35a9af6852ecbd41c0948ea1@i2pn2.org>
 <v629mp$1s632$3@dont-email.me>
 <168858894febbaa529d1704ea864bbe15cb8f635@i2pn2.org>
 <v62bgv$1s632$6@dont-email.me>
 <211a07c98d1fc183ed3e6c079ec1e883dd45f1cc@i2pn2.org>
 <v62f92$20moo$3@dont-email.me> <v632cm$23ohm$1@dont-email.me>
 <v63jbh$26loi$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 23:18:55 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2057085"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <v63jbh$26loi$5@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 4430
Lines: 74

On 7/3/24 9:22 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 7/3/2024 3:33 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>> Op 03.jul.2024 om 05:07 schreef olcott:
>>> On 7/2/2024 9:35 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 7/2/24 10:03 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 7/2/2024 8:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/2/24 9:32 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/2/2024 8:25 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/2/24 9:18 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Professor Sipser probably does understand the x86 language.
>>>>>>>>> Shared-memory implementation of the Karp-Sipser
>>>>>>>>> kernelization process
>>>>>>>>> https://inria.hal.science/hal-03404798/file/hipc2021.pdf
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And the x86 language says the same thing,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> YOU are just a liar, as proved by the fact that you can not give 
>>>>>>>> the Diagonalization proof you claimed you had.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry, you are just too stupid to understand.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You continue to assume that you can simply disagree
>>>>>>> with the x86 language. My memory was refreshed that
>>>>>>> called you stupid would be a sin according to Christ.
>>>>>>> I really want to do the best I can to repent.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But I am NOT disagreeing with the x86 language.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you point out what fact of it I am disagreing about it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You keep trying to get away with saying that the simulation is
>>>>> incorrect when the semantics of the x86 language conclusively
>>>>> proves that it is correct.
>>>>
>>>> Nope, and x86n emulation is only fully correct if it continues to 
>>>> the final end. 
>>>
>>> void Infinite_Loop()
>>> {
>>>    HERE: goto HERE;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Why do you say such ridiculously stupid things that you are are false?
>>>
>>
>> Your Infinite_Loop does not apply. For a two cycle recursive simulation
>>
> 
> This says nothing about two cycles nitwit.
> 
> _DDD()
> [00002172] 55               push ebp      ; housekeeping
> [00002173] 8bec             mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
> [00002175] 6872210000       push 00002172 ; push DDD
> [0000217a] e853f4ffff       call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
> [0000217f] 83c404           add esp,+04
> [00002182] 5d               pop ebp
> [00002183] c3               ret
> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
> 
> DDD is correctly emulated by HHH which calls an
> emulated HHH(DDD) to repeat the process until aborted.
> 
> 

And when aborted, DDD will then return, so HHH can not say that its 
input is non-halting.

Only that HHH can not POOP DDD. (where POOPing is assuemed to be the 
horse shit subjective criteria that HHH can not emulate the input to its 
conclusion.)