Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.
Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 20:52:45 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <5a607a13d3b1dd8db7a97742b7cf3247@www.novabbs.com>
References: <bee82c477b86c0caf1c30da405ed870f@www.novabbs.com> <1016jjl$35vvu$1@dont-email.me> <d279bfcd8e013cfb82fd36ae5ed16477@www.novabbs.com> <1019db0$3qq3l$1@dont-email.me> <b8539af84e66425e19352dcaf1fb23a5@www.novabbs.com> <101bvtv$e5aq$1@dont-email.me> <31a029f37652e40c0674747fff52ed04@www.novabbs.com> <101elmh$12n6q$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2740223"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$/r/lxrs0DRcATaRLNNo3WuDY5ZBw8n0qxZzPtYqtf4cbLtHbB7fly
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180

On Sat, 31 May 2025 10:29:37 +0000, Mikko wrote:

> On 2025-05-30 19:11:05 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said:
>
>> On Fri, 30 May 2025 10:05:51 +0000, Mikko wrote:
>>
>>> On 2025-05-29 21:18:15 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 29 May 2025 10:36:16 +0000, Mikko wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-05-28 19:02:10 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 28 May 2025 9:04:53 +0000, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2025-05-27 03:27:05 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Particle wave duality is no longer accepted as it has been
>>>>>>>> experimentally disproven.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The term "duality" refers to the observation that in most cases
>>>>>>> the behaviour of light can be understand with a theory where
>>>>>>> light is a wave or with a theory where light is a stream of
>>>>>>> particles.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, there are situations where both kind of theories give
>>>>>>> an incorrect prediction about the behaviour of light. Therefore
>>>>>>> both paticle and wave theories are inexact.
>>>>>
>>>>>> When electrons pass through the double slit experiment, they behave
>>>>>> similarly to waves in aggregate, as waves of H2O do, yet experiments
>>>>>> show they remain particles.
>>>>>
>>>>> The experiments do not show that they remain particles. They only
>>>>> show that in some situations they behave differently from classical
>>>>> waves.
>>>>>
>>>>> But an interference in e.g. in double slit experiment shows that
>>>>> they behave differently from classical particles.
>>>>>
>>>>> So both the wave theory and the particle theory are refuted.
>>>
>>>> The experiments do not show they become waves.
>>>
>>> THere is no "become". They are either always or never.
>
>> It is asserted that individual photons are inserted in the double slit
>> experiment and that they create interference patterns like waves hence a
>> duality. The fact that the light behaves here like a wave proves they
>> never reduced it to a single photon. It was always a wave.
>
> Classical particles do not produce an interference pattern. Classical
> waves do not produce counts of discrete detectons. Both can be observed
> in the double slit experiment so there is somthing that is not a
> classical wave and not a classical particle. It does not matter how you
> call it.
The only pattern the electrons form is a wave. Particles do that in
lakes. Waves in lakes form interference patterns.