| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<5b6f49b869bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi Subject: Re: Google Groups Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:41:09 +0100 Organization: None Lines: 69 Message-ID: <5b6f49b869bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> References: <7d12b7c7-1764-40cb-ac2c-a602fc55d5d3n@googlegroups.com> <uq5al2$2let3$1@dont-email.me> <uqf4j8$1vsp3$5@dont-email.me> <5b31fc9be8bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> <l313evF4k5pU1@mid.individual.net> <uqg11c$24ou7$1@dont-email.me> <5b321bf27fbob@sick-of-spam.invalid> <uqg36u$258bd$1@dont-email.me> <5b3220d740bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> <uqgids$283df$1@dont-email.me> X-Trace: individual.net xRr5cLJYuJLnzhZPDA/i+wJKLhuVuAGFzIzUYf00SFX/c5a6X+ X-Orig-Path: sick-of-spam.invalid!bob Cancel-Lock: sha1:1aG+p9vHoiuEcPZz7AxEHrdl2SM= sha256:rVXFwuJNTnmbFr0aXGITnM1cqpHLhr3bLZPztcetfnU= X-No-Archive: Yes User-Agent: NewsHound/v1.54 Bytes: 3430 In article <uqgids$283df$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 13/02/2024 16:26, Bob Latham wrote: > > In article <uqg36u$258bd$1@dont-email.me>, > > mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> wrote: > >> On 13/02/2024 15:32, Bob Latham wrote: > >>> In article <uqg11c$24ou7$1@dont-email.me>, > >>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Vaccinations certainly did work, > >>> > >>> Well I'm very sure they do not prevent transmission. > >>> > >>> Bob. > > > >> They reduce the likelihood of onward transmission. > > > > That's a new one, where did you get that from? > > > > Do I take that as a tacit admission that vaccines don't protect > > you from infection? Have we also dropped the notion that it helps > > if you get infected? > > > Oh dear. We have an ArtStudent? mind. Stuck in Boolean logic. > You are asking an ArtStudent? question. > The scientific questions is *how much* do vaccines reduce the risk > of infection, and the severity of the subsequent disease, and the > answer is, shitloads. [Snip] > It *has* stopped. Killing people. Vaccines have brought it down to > flu level - a bad week maybe in bed with painkillers, and that's > it. Not a life threatening infection with people gasping for > breath and dying. [Snip] > Lucky cousin. Without vaccinations she would probably be dead. > > I've seen no evidence vaccines do much good but they do do harm. > The evidence is that the episode your cousin has is now as bad as > it gets. > If you cant see that, don't get jabbed and die in a respirator > gasping for breath, like so many others have. TNP, as time goes by and more and more truth comes out I'm sure evidence will overwhelm your statements above, it's already starting. Take the time to watch these two videos. The first looks at the effects of midazolam which killed thousands but was attributed to covid. The second looks at vaccines.. He also, as an aside remark, points out that it was omicron which finally stopped the covid deaths. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3cqo9V2MzM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMYZg8_22y8 Infected blood took many years to come out. I suspect you'll attack either the doctor or the research papers and me rather than accept the truth but you never know, I might be surprised. Bob.