| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<5c265c0d6012a26abb9caa981e60323a@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Energy is for bunny-ahs (traders) Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 02:05:39 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <5c265c0d6012a26abb9caa981e60323a@www.novabbs.com> References: <730c4a156bd268ae1f9342119eb1ff2e@www.novabbs.com> <vi007m$1ar8b$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3999716"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$Db1hy93JRmppfXSeqP6.uewR7ABTrtiQGo41CnIjJ8SIRxHvRIbie X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010 Bytes: 2807 Lines: 37 On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:53:26 +0000, David Canzi wrote: > On 11/24/24 04:14, Bertietaylor wrote: >> Physics texts should avoid the word "energy" as much as possible. >> >> It is an unscientific term as it is so volatile and relative. >> >> Besides the so called law of conservation of energy is nonsense as shown >> by the phenomenon of radioactivity. Explaining that with e=mcc is even >> more nonsense. >> >> High time the world quitted bad physics and followed Arindam's physics >> that updates Newton and rejects Einstein. > > If you reject conservation of energy and conservation of momentum > you are shredding Newton, not updating him. Nonsense. Newton had nothing to do with such a ridiculous notion as law of conservation of energy. That came from the German scientists like Helmholtz. Newton was right about everything mechanical. He and Galileo lived long before electricity was discovered. Arindam updated Newtonian laws by taking electrical forces into account. His rail gun experiments violated inertia and created net momentum with application of electrical current. Just as Galileo changed the universe view with his new design telescope Arindam changed human destiny with his new design rail gun which violated inertia when the heavy bullet was blocked. > > The relativism you disdain is an irremovable feature of Newton's > physics and of Galileo before him. In an airplane flying straight > and level in non-turbulent air, a juggler can juggle just as he > would on the ground. He wouldn't have to adjust his movements in > any way to take account of the fact that the airplane is going > hundreds of miles per hour. That's an example of relativity. > > In 100 years, the names of Einstein, Newton, and Galileo will still > be famous. In 20 years nobody will remember yours.