Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<5ed96bd5-5eff-4f9e-8fa2-9118135f0d90n@googlegroups.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:57a6:0:b0:635:e6f8:b28d with SMTP id g6-20020ad457a6000000b00635e6f8b28dmr5214qvx.12.1690361159921; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 01:45:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1526:b0:3a1:ce2a:4ca5 with SMTP id u38-20020a056808152600b003a1ce2a4ca5mr3436141oiw.6.1690361159679; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 01:45:59 -0700 (PDT) Path: ...!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: fr.sci.physique Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 01:45:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <IwI8VDmOGUJ9sBKpGHXW9Imdz-k@jntp> Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a01:e0a:1df:790:f5d4:b465:2bb2:a5ac; posting-account=w5jTyQoAAABC2srlPP05kfcSlYpQVSR8 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a01:e0a:1df:790:f5d4:b465:2bb2:a5ac References: <c7524b11-c0a0-4f30-8591-344cb9d5c7ccn@googlegroups.com> <fd1276f4-255a-4f45-be59-ff194a9e6ebcn@googlegroups.com> <73qYKpWDMwfPz8CVdNf8htXodeM@jntp> <223547f2-b487-4608-9dd4-b5039d68ff7en@googlegroups.com> <u9o2qn$71c$3@shakotay.alphanet.ch> <4c0d8bb1-6722-4703-9776-4135917d1ca3n@googlegroups.com> <u9o82q$1ot$1@shakotay.alphanet.ch> <0146761c-18bf-4bf2-ac6b-8b2ba469d83an@googlegroups.com> <7RTsDq0oM6ooVp-929zClK7TWqo@jntp> <792147ce-b826-43c2-8a52-03fee7a6c7c7n@googlegroups.com> <IwI8VDmOGUJ9sBKpGHXW9Imdz-k@jntp> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <5ed96bd5-5eff-4f9e-8fa2-9118135f0d90n@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Les particules virtuelles = non existantes. From: Quarkim <chakim555@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 08:45:59 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bytes: 2143 Lines: 10 Je reformule la question autrement. Que voit un observateur en acc=C3=A9l=C3=A9ration par rapport =C3=A0 une pa= ire e- e+ ? Peut-on =C3=AAtre en acc=C3=A9l=C3=A9ration par rapport =C3=A0 cette paire = durant le bref temps du processus de cr=C3=A9ation-annihilation ? Si r=C3=A9ponse oui, alors il = y a violation de la relativit=C3=A9 --> le vide n'est pas un rep=C3=A8re. Si la r=C3=A9po= nse est non, pourquoi ?