Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!69.80.99.26.MISMATCH!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 19:29:05 +0000
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:O309nFECNS/s0WOhB/SdHgufosY=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Inconvenient lefties
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid>
References: <utks3h$35980$1@dont-email.me> <17c2951988fe8093$63098$3121036$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com> <uuj8q0$3rjq1$2@dont-email.me> <17c2cf26c4db72b2$7802$1100308$44d50e60@news.newsdemon.com> <uXidnTi_y4kvBpD7nZ2dnZfqn_EAAAAA@giganews.com> <uum1h8$juqp$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-E5C583.12321104042024@news.giganews.com> <uunfqr$v4iv$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-7882FB.18073604042024@news.giganews.com> <uuotqv$1d3sl$2@dont-email.me>
Message-ID: <5iadnW67MamczI37nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 19:29:05 +0000
Lines: 80
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-THt5qfDXoXokkd/gGZGzjCp4L/XbL/i8EtN4KXXKDVbwGppNzKH2uWysnJ8W0Jt6U8NLcQj3LB1uJLC!uUT5GXqNdZVA6ofZ2EEoPurfPMu9qcEtbLfTEGBrcSNa42TmVFw/0MGjpWVWmJsZIng7U9qxQxwA
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 5221

FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/4/24 9:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <uunfqr$v4iv$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 4/4/24 3:32 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <uum1h8$juqp$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 4/3/24 2:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2024 at 8:36:11 AM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 4/3/2024 5:50 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 4/2/24 5:52 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2024 1:16 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Mar 27, 2024 at 3:58:45 PM PDT, moviePig <never@nothere.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3/27/2024 6:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why is it that burning the American flag is protected speech,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but if you burn an Alphabet Mafia rainbow flag, you can get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arrested for a hate crime?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean a flag that does not belong to you, not your own flag.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I mean any rainbow flag. If you go buy one yourself, then take
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to an anti-troon protest and burn it, it's a hate crime.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But if you buy an American flag and take it to an Antifa riot and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> burn it, protected speech.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The former action is one of hate, the latter is one of protest.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> https://ibb.co/0FpvG4S
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> moviePig is unparseable here. Is he stating that protestors protest
>>>>>>>>>> against their friends and not their enemies? I'm so confused.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I'm here to help.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> In general, people who burn an American flag do so in protest of their
>>>>>>>>> own government's actions and policies, while those who burn a rainbow
>>>>>>>>> flag do so to express their hate of queers.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> If you own it, you can burn it.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> But not at a gay-pride march under laws against hate speech.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There are no laws against hate speech in the United States. If any
>>>>>> legislature should pass such a law, it would be unconstitutional.
>>>> 
>>>>> That was in the old Constitution. You know... the one Roberts, Alito,
>>>>> IKavanaugh, and Barret swore up and down they would go by.
>>>>> And then didn't.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Settled law, my ass. Alito quoted a 17th century Witch Hunter in his
>>>>> draft opinion on Roe (Dobbs).
>>>> 
>>>> Did he? That's awesome!
>>>> 
>>>>> Fuck this Illegitimate Supreme Court of Religious Fanatics.
>>>> 
>>>> This Supreme Court has reinforced free speech over government control
>>>> and sanction at nearly every opportunity, so regardless of whether
>>>> you're mentally fucking them or not (shudder), don't look for them to
>>>> suddenly embrace the notion of carving out a heretofore never before
>>>> noticed exception to the 1st Amendment and allow the government to start
>>>> suddenly punishing people for 'hate speech'.
>> 
>>> And your approval of them embracing a 17th century witch hunter tells us
>>> everything we need to know
>> 
>> I think it's hilariously awesome. I wish he'd cited Skynet, too!
>> 
> Yeah, I kinda thought you would believe rape is "awesome".
> Just surprised you admit to it.

You're a hoot, that's what you are!