Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<5otULM-LTRuGRVJZvTzsNLBAkpo@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <5otULM-LTRuGRVJZvTzsNLBAkpo@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.
References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <6782d853$0$28064$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
 <c2fdc44dd6b77812b78bd871c9bde8f3@www.novabbs.com> <4404fd8d88a2eacd658d92efeef4d6c2@www.novabbs.com>
 <vm3ncs$20493$1@dont-email.me> <7db98cab57f6050f8daf2f88b9bfdcdb@www.novabbs.com> <vm6lel$2jd9o$1@dont-email.me>
 <181aad880796ed2c$86763$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <FPWgcmBqx8knYkPFdVPJ444jTTI@jntp>
 <181aca6762647733$86829$1316151$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: _VqN_8VKspc8oZsKtZzmgb38Fyk
JNTP-ThreadID: 4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-Uri: http://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=5otULM-LTRuGRVJZvTzsNLBAkpo@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 25 11:01:32 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="cdcf91e3472b50c760e8dcbe4a2750ed9830a543"; logging-data="2025-01-15T11:01:32Z/9175405"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <jp@python.invalid>
Bytes: 3278
Lines: 46

Le 15/01/2025 à 07:39, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 14.01.2025 o 23:10, Python pisze:
>> Le 14/01/2025 à 22:50, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>> W dniu 14.01.2025 o 22:39, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> It is a fact that experiments have shown that GR correctly
>>>> predicts how light is gravitational deflected.
>>>
>>> A lie, of course - according to [GR],
>>> light [in vacuum] doesn't deflect
>>> and take always straight/geodesic paths.
>> 
>> How could you know anything about what GR says or doesn't say as you 
>> admit to stay as far as physics as possible 
> 
> Somehow I do.

Clearly not enough...

>> (for the record: a straight/geodesic path in space-time does not 
>> necessarily corresponds to a straight path in space.
> 
> If we're taking the delusional spacetime of your
> bunch of idiots and the real space - sure.

There is nothing delusional in spacetime. Moreover if you remove the 
concept of spacetime from GR, is not GR but a fantasy of yours.

> Anyway, according to [GR] of your idiot guru
> Light paths [in vacuum] are straight/geodesic
> in both.

No. Period.

>   Maciej is sooo
>> highly confused on everything, especially geometry. It is quite 
>> delusional to think that GR pretends so given that planets orbits [in 
>> space] are clearly not straight lines even if they correspond to 
>> geodesics in space-time).\
> 
> It's quite delusional, indeed, but I knew some
> relativistic [...] insisting on that.

In your silly dreams maybe, in reality certainly NOT.