Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<5stp8jlc0bndg2t57b92uujgv6frs01lih@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Disc brake maintenance tips Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 04:48:43 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 39 Message-ID: <5stp8jlc0bndg2t57b92uujgv6frs01lih@4ax.com> References: <v6a6tk$3ggeu$6@dont-email.me> <v6a9mp$3l2np$1@dont-email.me> <v6aau3$3l7ug$1@dont-email.me> <v6be64$3qc85$1@dont-email.me> <v6bnfi$3rvtv$1@dont-email.me> <h6ri8jl980fkg01h56603l5htkj168k7u2@4ax.com> <g8nj8jl3i63ku5hib2ccach3p3q9j2mv2j@4ax.com> <v6d3rn$6gvj$1@dont-email.me> <v6ebb0$cgrt$2@dont-email.me> <v6goh9$sl2v$2@dont-email.me> <v6gov2$sgk0$6@dont-email.me> <v6hgjn$10a9a$5@dont-email.me> <v6hn8d$11fal$7@dont-email.me> <v6i531$13d15$4@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 10:48:47 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="076604ff2e509394b3dd7772e75fe55a"; logging-data="1401945"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+I0RIdhi8Up7SFBckRx9HZzyUc7Py/Wcw=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:r0piMcYLEJQSWvEDBTuoK3V8jBs= Bytes: 3104 On Mon, 8 Jul 2024 21:51:29 -0400, Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >On 7/8/2024 5:55 PM, AMuzi wrote: >> On 7/8/2024 3:01 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >>> On 7/8/2024 9:18 AM, AMuzi wrote: >>>> 'Military use' or 'purposeful military design' are not at all clear >>>> or helpful terms. >>> >>> They are descriptive terms easily understood by those with no >>> emotional attachment to their firearms. In past discussions, specific >>> design features have been well described. >>> >>>> The best special forces sharpshooters use very expensive precision >>>> single shot bolt action rifles, not crappy 'spray and pray' automatics. >>> >>> As described over and over, AR pattern guns were originally designed >>> for military use. Most of their design features have no legitimate >>> civilian use, other than giving a temporary testosterone boost to some >>> guys at a shooting range. One can say similar things about many handguns. >>> >> >> Thanks for making my point again, by as usual purposefully conflating >> full auto AR or AK or whatever long guns with semi civilian models. > >Light weight, compact size, light ammunition allowing carrying lots of >rounds, magazines that are big and replaceable with huge ones, grips >that aid portability when running and aid recoil control during rapid >fire, plus many available "custom" attachments make AR and AK guns the >weapon of choice for killing unsuspecting crowds, Those are features available on many other guns. I think the fact that they look like the military guns is the reason many people buy them, and that they are scary looking is the reason the anti-gun loons hate them. It really comes down to how they look.