Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 19:50:14 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <6179d6619c9f6f918d23a60e19189a4f@www.novabbs.com>
References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <1819b35cb5854fb7$83258$1308629$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <17a125a3e75f42ff91ef08afdab4e0a9@www.novabbs.com> <1819b79e1aa58c97$89507$1329657$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9e55d347a16ad439d5b2e75440ae1a6d@www.novabbs.com> <6782d853$0$28064$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <c2fdc44dd6b77812b78bd871c9bde8f3@www.novabbs.com> <4404fd8d88a2eacd658d92efeef4d6c2@www.novabbs.com> <UjtKffdj34rh4B-JrKumzbeGtnc@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3458310"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$qzUSgUXvxV5e.uPO2rt3Y.AM3XNYRNJQpjsybBatwyORfsOUSqM1e
Bytes: 2844
Lines: 27

On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 15:06:47 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:

> Le 13/01/2025 à 06:07, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit
> :
>> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 1:31:59 +0000, rhertz wrote:
>
>> And Einstein used a refraction formula to double the deflection=
>> "photographic plates? Poor did, and he completely repudiated the
>> findings of Eddington. This should have given pause to any ethical
>> scientist.
>> Here are some quotes from Poor's summary: "The mathematical
>> formula, by which Einstein calculated his deflection of 1.75
>> seconds for light rays passing the edge of the sun, is a well known
>> and simple formula of physical optics"; "Not a single one of the
>> fundamental concepts of varying time, or warped or twisted space,
>> of simultaneity, or of the relativity of motion is in any way involved
>> in Einstein's prediction of, or formulas for, the deflection of light";
>> "The many and elaborate eclipse expeditions have, therefore,
>> been given a fictitious importance. Their results can neither prove
>> nor disprove the relativity theory" (emphasis added) (Poor, 1930)." -
>> saved pdf = "Albert Einsetin, Plagiarist of the Century" p.9
>
> Einstein is an artificial media creation. Like Emmanuel Macron or Greta
> Thunberg. No more.
>
> R.H.
Indeed, Einstein is always entirely beside the point. The point is that
the formula is an optics formula, not a gravitation formula.