Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be
 willfully ignorant
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 23:23:41 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <623debd817e63a256100bb15fed3af8d4fb969fe@i2pn2.org>
References: <v5vkun$1b0k9$1@dont-email.me> <v60dci$1ib5p$1@dont-email.me>
 <v60red$1kr1q$2@dont-email.me> <v61hn7$1oec9$1@dont-email.me>
 <v61ipa$1og2o$2@dont-email.me> <v61jod$1oec9$2@dont-email.me>
 <v61leu$1p1uo$1@dont-email.me>
 <7b6a00827bfcc84e99e19a0d0ae6028ebcdc263c@i2pn2.org>
 <v620vu$1qutj$2@dont-email.me>
 <f6e8f5de9a1e61c7970a92145ce8c1f9087ba431@i2pn2.org>
 <v628ts$1s632$1@dont-email.me>
 <178edf6a7c5329df35a9af6852ecbd41c0948ea1@i2pn2.org>
 <v629mp$1s632$3@dont-email.me>
 <168858894febbaa529d1704ea864bbe15cb8f635@i2pn2.org>
 <v62bgv$1s632$6@dont-email.me>
 <211a07c98d1fc183ed3e6c079ec1e883dd45f1cc@i2pn2.org>
 <v62f92$20moo$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 03:23:41 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1962626"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <v62f92$20moo$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3814
Lines: 61

On 7/2/24 11:07 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 7/2/2024 9:35 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 7/2/24 10:03 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 7/2/2024 8:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 7/2/24 9:32 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 7/2/2024 8:25 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/2/24 9:18 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Professor Sipser probably does understand the x86 language.
>>>>>>> Shared-memory implementation of the Karp-Sipser
>>>>>>> kernelization process
>>>>>>> https://inria.hal.science/hal-03404798/file/hipc2021.pdf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> And the x86 language says the same thing,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> YOU are just a liar, as proved by the fact that you can not give 
>>>>>> the Diagonalization proof you claimed you had.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, you are just too stupid to understand.
>>>>>
>>>>> You continue to assume that you can simply disagree
>>>>> with the x86 language. My memory was refreshed that
>>>>> called you stupid would be a sin according to Christ.
>>>>> I really want to do the best I can to repent.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But I am NOT disagreeing with the x86 language.
>>>>
>>>> Can you point out what fact of it I am disagreing about it?
>>>>
>>>
>>> You keep trying to get away with saying that the simulation is
>>> incorrect when the semantics of the x86 language conclusively
>>> proves that it is correct.
>>
>> Nope, and x86n emulation is only fully correct if it continues to the 
>> final end. 
> 
> void Infinite_Loop()
> {
>    HERE: goto HERE;
> }
> 
> Why do you say such ridiculously stupid things that you are are false?
> 

And the only CORRECT EMULATION of that program is to infiniately loop in 
the emulation.

Nothing says that you can't make a halt decider work with partial 
emulation for SOME inputs. But the halt Decider just isn't itself a 
fully correct emulator.

You don't seem to understand the difference between EMULATING something, 
and deciding on its behavior.

I can add 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ... + 99 + 100 and get the answer without 
needing to actually add all the numbers up.

But if I have a program DEFINED to add the input numbers, in order, then 
it needs to do that, and do all 99 seperate additions.