Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe
 Eisenman c.2017
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 17:56:20 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <624a3ac01acfb7198d4cdfe271962618@www.novabbs.com>
References: <85833f45090e93c972df5de38c6b5bb8@www.novabbs.com> <vk97qb$lh9o$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="4142838"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$DT9gngXuatb1rIuD7co4CuUO3JpP8ET2AySV57hRCw3VirkYz9yaG
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
Bytes: 3067
Lines: 44

On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 14:32:12 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

> Den 22.12.2024 04:56, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>> He shows that the Maxwell equations are invariant under the Galilean
>> transformations making the LT invalid.
>>
>> free pdf =
>> https://www.globalscientificjournal.com/researchpaper/Back-to-Galilean-
>> Transformation-and-Newtonian-Physics-Refuting-the-Theory-of-Relativity.pdf
>>
>> "Abstract
>> This paper refutes the theory of relativity. Previous attempts by others
>> were based on pointing at contradictions between corollaries of the
>> theory of relativity and reality, often called paradoxes. The main point
>> of this article is to indicate and correct the error that led scientists
>> at the turn of the twentieth century to formulate the faulty theory of
>> relativity."
>
> Another quote:
>
> A.5 Speed of Propagation of Electric and Magnetic Fields
> --------------------------------------------------------
> "In this section we will prove that the physical laws on which
>   Maxwell's equations are based imply that electric and magnetic
>   fields propagate at an infinite speed. In other words, if
>   the speeds of propagation of electric and magnetic fields are
>   finite – the following laws are inconsistent, i.e., they are
>   self-contradictory."
>
> The "following laws" are Maxwell's equation.
>
> So Eisenmann claims to have proved that Maxwell's equations
> predict that the speed of EM-radiation is infinite.
>
> Considering that Maxwell in 1865 showed that according his
> equations the speed of EM-radiation is a constant, and all
> physicists ever since know that Maxwell's equations
> do indeed predict that the speed of EM-radiation in vacuum
> is a constant, Eisenmann must be a brave person claiming
> otherwise after 150 years!
>
> And a bit stupid?
Nonetheless, his main point holds good. There is no intelligent reason
to have an LT instead of the Galilean transformation without an ether.
To use the LT is stupid. Very stupid.