Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: do you believe we can quantize =?UTF-8?B?Z3Jhdml0eT8=?=
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 06:37:56 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <63005891cd240fd7b358b2d7e2b6244c@www.novabbs.com>
References: <j9oiptyjxgxi$.dlg@tomato.potato> <02cff57f49c5b9f6ef0d33441951cb1e@www.novabbs.com> <lqsstk-85j62.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <678b32e2a0eba553fdcf24b9489cc5d5@www.novabbs.com> <aflttk-b2682.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <06a143affa77a528480f8fb55f650787@www.novabbs.com> <o0gvtk-5gba2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <171469a06dcc0b480244123ef80cb6c7@www.novabbs.com> <76c0uk-4rvb2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <96c8579ab960aa5997554af4cd2c3f7e@www.novabbs.com> <dji0uk-s68c2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2104801"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$qhaA6CcJCK4AjAo2xkQunu4N6UMHjWV.4aBpA.uDjzL1xQbhcWr0C
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3736
Lines: 72

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 22:29:35 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:40:09 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 12:39:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 20:00:12 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip old crap>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Having watched your videos I have to ask, what is it that you think is
>>>>>>> new in YOUR railgun in one sentence? Where is your math that shows it is
>>>>>>> anything new?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Heavy armature, very low voltage, very light weight.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing new there whatsoever.
>>>>
>>>> Keep on lying.
>>>>>
>>>>>> It is a new design
>>>>>> rail gun which proved Arindam's thesis that it has no reaction by easily
>>>>>> reproducible experiment. Which is the greatest science discovery of our
>>>>>> time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yet you have no details, no instrumentation, no data and no analysis
>>>>> with error bars that prove anything.  Just crackpot ravings.
>>>>
>>>> Keep on lying. What better to expect from racist bigots!
>>>
>>> Does your railgun have two parallel conductors connected to a DC power
>>> source?
>>>
>>> Yes, nothing new there.
>>
>> Did any other railgun design work in this manner?
>> Did any previous railgun design have manually portable low weight, low
>> voltage, and very heavy armature?
>>
>> NO
>
> Yes.

Who did that, lying wretch?
>
>> This PARTICULAR railgun ***design*** IS A NEW INVENTION.
>
> Nope.

Yes. No one did it before.
>
> The mathmatics that describes how railguns work has been known for a
> long time.
>
> How is the mathmatics that describes how your railguns works any
> different crackpot?

Penisnino that maths is beyond your scope. Keep on chanting e=MCC. Your
dull mind cannot go beyond that.
Arindam is under no obligation to educate liars, frauds, fools, abusive
apes pretending to be scientific.
Those with wits will understand from the vast wealth of the information
he has already provided.
The penisninos around are for his entertainment.
I see Arindam laughing now.
>
> Oh, sorry, I forgot, you have no mathmatics, crackpot.
>
> <snip information free kook babble unread>