Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<631323acf0c3dda0238e7c216ad843ab@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX, Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:27:32 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <631323acf0c3dda0238e7c216ad843ab@www.novabbs.com> References: <dad338831baa98f3eb1ca50452fd9401@www.novabbs.com> <be051db4136835108537c9497c5dfab8@www.novabbs.com> <e766d5b3f2f87f9604f0937ad65a4284@www.novabbs.com> <3fddf5a7bc291abaf2bc49d856d87fcb@www.novabbs.com> <45ca134f20b357d137e34b1fcdd80764@www.novabbs.com> <f4ec6c0220ab548a18740c2680d12dee@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2607714"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="hWiuCAeR3KEZYJfTvV11n0qrRi6oqW/zjvEZQQGun9A"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: f685b96694175b2ad43ead343ead0a9c0082fe88 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$xolSkZ8HQKuA2Oy3ModuSevbrQ2IqBbnMon5GBSiN5M3vO0s8iyiG Bytes: 4280 Lines: 76 ====================================================================== ALL FOUR CLOCKS were used for both sets of flights. You need at least three clocks, and preferably more, to perform correlated rate change analysis. Haven't you read my description of the technique? Reread the papers. You've descended into complete fantasy here. ====================================================================== Let me know HOW DID THEY SEPARATE THE DATA FROM EASTWARD AND WESTWARD FLIGHTS by using the SAME clocks, without real time interconnection with Washington? You HAVE TO think deeper about the complete setup for the experiment. Your thinking fail at many levels: measuring each path separately and the statistical manipulations that were used AFTER the experiment. If four clocks were used, how did they extract the data regarding eastward and westward flights, if the separate path (east-west) CAN'T BE DISTINGUISHED, because the four clocks accumulated the data of the whole trip? Did they use some theoretical formulae to do so, plus the statistical manipulation? The experiment IS NOT CREDIBLE. It was a FRAUD, and relativists celebrated it, because they are willing to buy anything that led to say "Einstein was right". Make sense, please. Read this critic: ********************************************************************************************** Critical Reflection on the Hafele and Keating Experiment Witold Nawrot Hungarian Academy of Science https://www.kritik-relativitaetstheorie.de/2013/06/critical-reflection-on-the-hafele-and-keating-experiment/ EXCERPT: The derivation of formulae in the Hafele and Keating experiment had intuitive character and, as the final formula shows, the intuition does not disappoint the authors. However, this intuitive derivation only works for the rotational motion of the Earth around its axis. It is not valid for any other rotational motions. Of course the time dilation effect, which Hafele and Keating tried to measure many years ago, is now applied in the GPS navigation, but the fact of publishing and accepting the erroneous theory and the unsatisfactory experimental part in the most renowned physical journals [4,5] forces us to reflect on the understanding of the Relativity Theory and perhaps to take a closer look at other experiments from the RT area, as well as from the other branches of physics. The experiment performed in the way described above has no scientific value and the derivation of any additional ideas on the basis of this experiment can lead to false conclusions. References: W. Nawrot, Phys. Essays 17, 518 (2004) A.G. Kelly, Phys. Essays 13, 616 (2000) D. E. Spencer, U. Shama Proc. International Scientific Congress „Fundamental Problems of Natural Science and Engineering” Saint-Petersburg, Russia 2002 J.C. Hafele, Nature 227, 270 (1970) J.C. Hafele and R.E. Keating, Science 177, 166 (1972) *************************************************************************************