Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Steps counting apps
Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 17:12:06 +0200
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <63tmhkx76t.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
References: <MPG.40afe58775b3726f989713@paganini.bofh.team>
 <v9chhkxloa.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <v254f7$1jmiv$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net JfilWQP5fVi2U/UV9yg/2wrAiiaGY8tqx2piDaOChxttcOhxN+
X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HO08K/O9lbknqFsK+6SVA84oLVY= sha256:s0+fww0XQs5aveZPdJdG/YqQs7HqqNxLLXzRXTSDETY=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: es-ES, en-CA
In-Reply-To: <v254f7$1jmiv$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 1886

On 2024-05-16 16:16, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
> On 16.05.24 14:54, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>> On 2024-05-16 11:43, Jim the Geordie wrote:
>>> Just out of curiosity I thought I might try a STEPS counter app.
>>> Many seem to come with all sorts of health monitoring extras, which I'm
>>> not bothered about, but happy to enter and not use.
>>> However there are massive differences between them on the numbers of
>>> steps they claim I have taken and some don't appear to work at all.
>>> I'm not wanting to start a thread about the health benefits, just to
>>> find the simplest, accurate, free one.
>>
>> A cheap smart watch will do it easily and accurately.
> 
> Jim asked for an app on his *Android phone*.

I am aware.

> By far not everyone wants to wear one of these ugly and for all visible
> "watches". And btw they are not more accurate than a smartphone.

Having used both, I disagree.

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.