Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<642001c0c514172c85baaaf03df3235d@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: DeepBlue <dan.koren@gmail.com> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings Subject: Re: New Berlin Philharmonic box is similiar to the Furtwangler box Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 06:33:38 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <642001c0c514172c85baaaf03df3235d@www.novabbs.com> References: <0001HW.2DAB719D06A5992F30B04538F@news.giganews.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="276003"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="+LX6U+QEdxmX65G/ioNLHVfhXMvuBu5fNOpF5omT0G8"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$hzaJzF9NG1eqNMvJfLGxwO6UZm8affCCPIRFgh1/T8awB3pIIV9Oi X-Rslight-Posting-User: 9e00570fb1895deee7851c86c763dbf872b2557c X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2879 Lines: 42 On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 4:14:21 +0000, Pluted Pup wrote: > > https://www.berliner-philharmoniker-recordings.com/karajan-edition.html?___store=rec_en > > The same bad packaging and fake stereo is in the > new Karajan box as is in the Furtwangler box: > > https://www.amazon.com/Radio-Recordings-1939-45-BERLINER-PHILHARMONIKER/dp/B07NHRJ3PM/ > > I checked the first Karajan hybrid SACD (first of 24) and > it is a 1953 and 1954 recordings in fake stereo. Mono > recordings do not change their sound when they are folded > from two channels into one, only stereo and fake recordings do. > > Why muffle good tape sources with fake stereo? It also > is misleadingly described, the CD is listed in mono, > but it's not, it's fake stereo. Just like in the > Furtwangler box they do not disclose that the audio is > degraded by fake stereo. > > As for the packaging, what John Fowler says about the > Furtwangler box from the above link roughly applies here: > > "The packaging is just plain dumb: It was designed by an "artist" > who was more concerned with superficial appearances than with > ease of use. Any librarian could have done a better job. The > 184 page hardcover book has three informative essays (in German > and English) + many rare photographs. That part is good. What > it doesn't have is the basics: No program notes about the music > (some of which is quite obscure). No texts or translations for > the vocal works. The 22 SACDs are packaged in a fold-out box > without proper protection for the discs (and no recording dates > or track listings on the box). The table of contents does not > include recording dates either (you must turn to the fine print > on pages 9-37 to discover discographic information). It even > lacks an alphabetical index to composers and compositions." > > 128 page book, 24 hybrid SACDs. Still obsessed with boxology ?!? Cheers!