Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH ---USPTO
 Incorporation by reference --- despicable dishonesty
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 19:02:30 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <65d495d5d1da61e1bff8426a80fb7d6b046a7f71@i2pn2.org>
References: <vo6420$3mpmf$1@dont-email.me> <vote0u$nf28$1@dont-email.me>
 <3b8a5f4be53047b2a6c03f9678d0253e137d3c40@i2pn2.org>
 <votn1l$pb7c$1@dont-email.me>
 <5cd9bc55c484f10efd7818ecadf169a11fcc58e1@i2pn2.org>
 <votq5o$ppgs$1@dont-email.me> <vouu57$12hqt$3@dont-email.me>
 <vp1jkg$1kstl$1@dont-email.me> <vp1qp1$1m05h$2@dont-email.me>
 <vp46l6$26r1n$1@dont-email.me> <vp5t55$2gt2s$1@dont-email.me>
 <vp6pmb$2opvi$1@dont-email.me> <vp8700$30tdq$1@dont-email.me>
 <vp8att$1cec$1@news.muc.de> <vp8h5n$32ifn$1@dont-email.me>
 <39c74e68a47f768d432f5528493b6db9b946ea83@i2pn2.org>
 <vpcvc7$irt$6@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 00:02:30 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1324222"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <vpcvc7$irt$6@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3073
Lines: 37

On 2/22/25 11:52 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 2/22/2025 5:05 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:25:27 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>> On 2/20/2025 4:38 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2/20/2025 2:38 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-02-20 00:31:33 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>
>>>>>>> I have given everyone here all of the complete source code for a few
>>>>>>> years
>>>>>> True but irrelevant. OP did not specify that HHH means that
>>>>>> particular code.
>>>>> Every post that I have been talking about for two or more years has
>>>>> referred to variations of that same code.
>>>> Yes.  It would be a relief if you could move on to posting something
>>>> new and fresh.
>>> As soon as people fully address rather than endlessly dodge my key
>>> points I will be done.
>> Honestly, you're gonna die first, one way or the other.
>>
>>> Let's start with a root point.
>>> All of the other points validate this root point.
>>> *Simulating termination analyzer HHH correctly determines*
>>> *the non-halt status of DD*
>> Since DD halts, that's dead in the water.
>>
> 
> Despicably intentionally dishonest attempts at the straw-man
> deception aside:
> 
> DD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate
> normally by reaching its own "return" instruction.
> 

Only because that statement is based on a false premise.

Since HHH doesn't correctly simulate its input, your statement is just a 
fabrication of your imagination.