Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<65e966d956f6fde5dbe8662eed7c2013b34fd6a9@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser
 agreed to are exactly met
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 21:45:11 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <65e966d956f6fde5dbe8662eed7c2013b34fd6a9@i2pn2.org>
References: <1005jsk$3akrk$1@dont-email.me>
 <bc6f0f045212bdfb7f7d883426873a09e37789ea@i2pn2.org>
 <1005u6v$3cpt2$1@dont-email.me> <1006oi9$3l93f$1@dont-email.me>
 <1007kan$3qb7l$8@dont-email.me> <1009n2d$b9ol$1@dont-email.me>
 <100ag73$g1r8$1@dont-email.me> <100c83u$tspg$1@dont-email.me>
 <100ctuc$121rs$1@dont-email.me> <100d5b7$13m1e$1@dont-email.me>
 <221167c1bbedbbda1934b12f6b2c72de2c3a1f78@i2pn2.org>
 <100dckr$1586e$1@dont-email.me>
 <c5c825970bebea6bd8bfde7077f7ffc5ba0c30f5@i2pn2.org>
 <100dedr$15dil$3@dont-email.me>
 <771e0f3f36c9914146f675bc9e2c1c0e7903c116@i2pn2.org>
 <100dfc8$15qbo$1@dont-email.me>
 <35c9fb020e868823c3e46c006d9ac4698eaf4f82@i2pn2.org>
 <100dl6g$16vdn$1@dont-email.me>
 <f02a2fb26f6e1dedd29638f9b42befaab4781f17@i2pn2.org>
 <100dst7$18epo$1@dont-email.me> <100f18f$1iree$1@dont-email.me>
 <100gvv6$22oen$2@dont-email.me> <100h9le$24iha$1@dont-email.me>
 <100i43k$292ko$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 02:05:46 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1242548"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <100i43k$292ko$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0

On 5/20/25 10:37 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 5/20/2025 2:06 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2025-05-20 04:20:54 +0000, olcott said:
>>
>>> <MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
>>>      If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its
>>>      input D until H correctly determines that its simulated D
>>>      would never stop running unless aborted then
>>>
>>> Do you understand that we are only evaluating whether
>>> or not HHH/DDD meets this above criteria?
>>
>> I do understand that the meaning of the behaviour is not mentioned
>> in the creteria and is therefore irrelevant, an obvious consequence
>> of which is that your "WRONG!" above is false.
>>
> 
> *H correctly simulates its input D until*
> specifies that HHH must simulate DDD according
> to the meaning of the rules of the x86 language.
> 
> The meaning of every step of the behavior is
> precisely specified by the x86 language.
> 
> _DDD()
> [00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
> [00002173] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
> [0000217f] 83c404     add esp,+04
> [00002182] 5d         pop ebp
> [00002183] c3         ret
> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
> 
> *H correctly simulates its input D*
> 00002172 00002173 00002175 0000217a
> H correctly simulates itself simulating DDD
> 00002172 00002173 00002175 0000217a

So, UUU only simulates the first 4 instuctions and then gives up.

To say it goes farther is just admittng that it doesn't do it correctly.

> 
> *until H correctly determines that its simulated D*
> *would never stop running unless aborted*

No, it gave up after 4 instructions, and then tried again.

Or, are you saying the "correct simulation" of the call HHH NOT TO keep 
simulating the code of HHH.

> 
> H sees DDD call the same function with the same
> parameter and there are no conditional branch
> instructions from the beginning of DDD to calling
> HHH(DDD) again. This repeating pattern proves
> non-termination.
> 
> 

But that isn't a correct criteria, not unless HHH *IS* just a pure 
simulator, which means it CAN'T abort, so you are just demonstrating 
that you are just lying about what you are doing.