Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Energy is for bunny-ahs (traders)
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 10:35:52 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <65ep1l-sdt31.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References: <730c4a156bd268ae1f9342119eb1ff2e@www.novabbs.com> <bcfc1c5a30d87ec65328e93132675bb6@www.novabbs.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 19:46:05 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="71242fa4e97e024b9cb8958daaf4eca7";
	logging-data="1276887"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+mLajdAkh6O7vgyJkyIHzL"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-126-lowlatency (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:yT51NRDxbjD479mrCjy8YaeZw04=
Bytes: 1836

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 9:14:02 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:
> 
>> Physics texts should avoid the word "energy" as much as possible.
>>
>> It is an unscientific term as it is so volatile and relative.
>>
>> Besides the so called law of conservation of energy is nonsense as shown
>> by the phenomenon of radioactivity. Explaining that with e=mcc is even
>> more nonsense.
>>
>> High time the world quitted bad physics and followed Arindam's physics
>> that updates Newton and rejects Einstein.
>>
>> Bertietaylor
> 
> Up Arindam Down Einstein!

That is only going to happen if you ever publish an article on something
other than social media that has actual data and data analysis that
shows you are other than a delusional crackpot.

And that will never happen, crackpot.