Path: ...!uucp.uio.no!fnord.no!news1.firedrake.org!nntp.terraraq.uk!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!198.186.190.30.MISMATCH!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!us1.netnews.com!eu1.netnews.com!not-for-mail
X-Trace: DXC=>aQHn_UFfVdgbAWgI2o77`U5[F2hIijDo7J470dMQQ7kbnl:Bh6K7Qb_a3f0Ymho:`m8]6Z^_D\\jebXQl:3;ULgmOQHHBU_jZf=;]WM?^6i2aH:>GTgo3NLe
X-Complaints-To: support@frugalusenet.com
From: gbbgu <gbbgu@gbbgu.com>
Newsgroups: rec.games.frp.dnd
Subject: Re: [dicebreaker] Is the next version of Dungeons & Dragons coming too late?
X-Face: +|sL/Gh{tYJ*kM#HR<@Y%`FkF/`Y?+8N4m(2YM]:<r_Uo0Io4e^g"lX:Q0V~j.7,+rc8E=,  \]E.gCS^Hk1h%vMI/66h689CFD=CXqW`VF(wt&\A'jMdQrh$CV2h2_p<(x&j:e1.>6q_=51=a}^zF\  yu4#DmCl'?T9Na5#U<#WnV]V<\ywSJhiV=)TtqQn?tc7T*z4Nz0t[t.S)63N58*HUCH`x
References: <ut1b73$kfst$1@sibirocobombus.campaignwiki>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Usenapp for MacOS
X-Usenapp: v1.27.2/l - Full License
Date: 26 Mar 2024 03:20:59 GMT
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <66023f1b$0$4193$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: 1711423259 reader.netnews.com 4193 127.0.0.1:45699
Bytes: 2034

On 15 Mar 2024, kyonshi wrote:

> This feels partly the fault of Wizards of the Coast itself. Since One
> D&D - now called Dungeons & Dragons 2024 - was first announced in

Confusion about the release isn't helping. 6e, 5.5e, 5.1e, no it's just 5e
really, one dnd, dnd 2024... I'm sure I've missed some in there.

Just pick a version, call it that and be consistant. I get they don't want to
alienate all the new 5e players that bought stuff off the back of the
popularity bump of 2020, but pathfinder managed this with the remaster
release. Everyone knew it was a remaster, made sure the fans understood what
was coming, the compatability etc, and I don't recall seeing any complaints.


-- 
gbbgu