Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed1-b.proxad.net!nnrp1-1.free.fr!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: =?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane?= CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr>
Subject: Re: "Much higher CPU Usage on Linux than on Windows"
References: <uvf4mo$38je5$1@dont-email.me>
 <HNWcnQdK95LQz4b7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@supernews.com>
 <uvh5f5$3oq8o$1@dont-email.me>
Organization: Mulots' Killer
User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 14 Apr 2024 20:03:44 GMT
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <661c36a0$0$3264$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Apr 2024 22:03:44 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.201.248.7
X-Trace: 1713125024 news-2.free.fr 3264 78.201.248.7:38760
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Bytes: 2026

Le 14-04-2024, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> a écrit :
> On 4/13/2024 11:49 PM, Tyrone wrote:
>> On Apr 13, 2024 at 7:32:39 PM EDT, "DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I got similar results when Linux consumed 21% of the CPU just moving a
>>> Thunderbird window around, but Windows used no more than 6% doing the
>>> same thing.
>>>
>>> Linux:   https://ibb.co/CJzXdBb
>>> Windows: https://ibb.co/JBBkqWs
>> 
>> Which is almost certainly due to better video card drivers on Windows. 
>
>
> Most likely I was using the proprietary nVidia driver for Linux and Windows.
>
> Either way, Linuxfux will make some lame excuse.

I don't know and I don't care. What I know is I see a lot of people with
an old computer running Windows with difficulties because it's too slow.
And when we put Linux on it it gives life back to the computer.

So, I already see you have some issues with Linux which looks like you
are the only one in the world to encounter. I have no explanation. But
generally, from my experience, Linux is faster than Windows.

-- 
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io