Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<6633f791.14ca5014@spirtech.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post02.iad01!roadrunner.com!not-for-mail From: francois.grieu@spirtech.com Message-ID: <6633f791.14ca5014@spirtech.com> Newsgroups: sci.crypt,z-netz.test Subject: @@@@@ to be statutory or permanent will learn mature crosss to early round @@@@@ Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 02:18:19 GMT Organization: when will you cool the disciplinary tough paintings before Doris does Lines: 34 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com Bytes: 1897 X-Original-Bytes: 1854 were permanently numbered; so law enforcement could scan them at will: there would be a revolt. Yet that is what is happening. Fingerprints, scanned into a computer, are a number. The number is inescapably yours. Modern technology means they don't have to put the number on you, they can read it off of you by minutely examining your body. And: it is the NSA driving the fingerprint-rollout of the national ID card. # "The Body As Password", By Ann Davis, Wired Magazine, July 1997 # # Currently housed at the National Security Agency, a working group of # federal bureaucrats founded the Biometric Consortium in the early 1990s. # Its 1995 charter promises to "promote the science and performance of # biometrics for the government." # # Consortium mumbers include state welfare agencies, driver's license # bureaus, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the Social Security # Administration, and the Internal Revenue Service. If my attempts to show how bad a thing this is have been too rambling, too abstract, here is a simple and accurate analogy: * "Project L.U.C.I.D.", by Texe Marrs, 1996, ISBN 1-884302-02-5 * * It was Martin Anderson who, in his book, Revolution, re