Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<66400c90$0$7171$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us4.netnews.com!not-for-mail X-Trace: DXC=H5U1CbHD6G2[XeeEkh:@g0HWonT5<]0T=Q;nb^V>PUf65[gZBW6J?L<ZHjmnLVPdB=X@m]f>mH8R8_2lIB[EfXj<4aJ4o0;e1R3Jm\SNBEHhg0ZD<hbN6noA5 X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net From: Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> Subject: Re: Windows victims: go ahead and pretend you don't want or need the greatest PC software available Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy References: <6638465a$0$8092$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v1b2u5$2ln8f$1@dont-email.me> <v1d5js$37vta$1@dont-email.me> <v1d890$38ipq$3@dont-email.me> <v1dkd3$3bcdt$2@dont-email.me> <v1emo6$3mufo$4@dont-email.me> <v1fr2o$3urp9$2@dont-email.me> <v1hrir$gq62$1@dont-email.me> <663cbb0a$0$7181$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v1llp2$1fduo$7@dont-email.me> <663eaba3$0$7062$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v1ocli$25j98$4@dont-email.me> User-Agent: Pan/0.146 (Hic habitat felicitas; d7a48b4 gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pan.git) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: 12 May 2024 00:25:52 GMT Lines: 57 Message-ID: <66400c90$0$7171$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1 X-Trace: 1715473552 reader.netnews.com 7171 127.0.0.1:52509 Bytes: 3991 On Sat, 11 May 2024 14:16:18 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On Fri, 10 May 2024 17:33:22 +0000, RonB wrote: >> >>> On 2024-05-09, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote: >>>> On Thu, 09 May 2024 06:47:55 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 8 May 2024 08:27:04 -0400, Andrzej Matuch wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think the most common complaint of people using Linux CLI or GUI >>>>>> tools is that they look dated. >>>>> >>>>> Are they taking Microsoft, of all people, as arbiters of good taste? >>>> >>>> There are definitely more people out there who are fans of the >>>> Microsoft aesthetics than there are people who appreciate the dated >>>> interfaces of open-source software. All of them will admit that the >>>> "ugly" software still does the job, but it appears that the way a >>>> program looks is as important as whether it completes the task. >>> >>> I don't admit it. And I don't like the Windows "aesthetic." I do find >>> it a bit amusing that Windows' users simultaneously claim that 1) >>> Linux copies the Windows desktop and 2) It has a dated interface. >> >> Both are true, 1) Linux indeed copies features and aesthetics of both >> Windows and Mac OS but 2) does a very poor job of getting it right, in >> my cases. The lack of consistency is very noticeable, and you'll have >> something like the default desktop of Ubuntu which looks incredible... >> until you open up a program which doesn't fit with the overall look at >> all. > > Like Microsoft's own system apps that revert to some old-style GUI > rather than the flat-ass Win 10+ interface? > > Or applications that provide their own window decoration no matter what > OS they're on? To be fair, no one uses Windows' system apps. WordPad's lack of use, in particular, is a shame. It really was more than most people needed. >>> Actually Linux has a LOT of interfaces. Windows only has one, and it's >>> "dated" and ugly in my opinion. >> >> I like the look myself, but find that it quickly gets boring. In fact, >> that's probably why I like installing Linux and trying something else >> out all the time. > > I hear you on that one. Though I kind of fixate on Fluxbox (or Xfce4) > and use lxappearance, gtk-chtheme, gtk-theme-switch2, > xfce4-appearance-settings, Fluxbox themes, or qt5ct to get a more > harmonious look). I alwaus end up missing the Buuf icons. I kind of wish I could use them in Windows. The fact that my desktop looks like everyone else's (except for the animated wallpaper courtesy of ArmouryCrate), does a lot to bore me.