Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<6649d383$0$7529$426a74cc@news.free.fr> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed1-b.proxad.net!nnrp6-1.free.fr!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy From: =?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane?= CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?Q?Syst=C3=A8me?= D References: <v07d66$1e8u1$1@dont-email.me> <v21u2d$pi80$1@dont-email.me> <v28j7a$2cpc8$2@dont-email.me> <17d065abdba646e4$55$3291601$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> Organization: Mulots' Killer User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: 19 May 2024 10:25:07 GMT Lines: 54 Message-ID: <6649d383$0$7529$426a74cc@news.free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 May 2024 12:25:07 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.201.248.7 X-Trace: 1716114307 news-3.free.fr 7529 78.201.248.7:39288 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Bytes: 2965 Le 17-05-2024, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> a écrit : > On Fri, 17 May 2024 21:46:19 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> >> That was purely a distro choice, to take advantage of the more robust >> service-management features that systemd offers. >> > > Another lackey, ignoramus statement. Another great post where you are looking through a mirror. > GNU/Linux, at least on the desktop workstation, does NOT require > "services," let alone "service management." You are confused. Once again. As your computer does nothing, it requires nothing else than a compiler to be able to fail miserably to compile your kernel. But a useful workstation can be improved greatly with service management. And systemd is very good at it. > I operate a totally potent desktop workstation and I have NO > "services." None. Zip. Nada. Yes, of course your desktop is useless, no need of service for staring at failing compilation logs endlessly. > Thus your lackey contention is full of fucking shit. It's the difference between looking stupidly a once computer and using it efficiently. > Sytemd is an abomination There are issues with systemd. Granted. But there is nothing good enough to replace it. As you are the best programmer in pretence in the world, you just have one thing to do: write something that does everything that systemd is good at without his issues. And everyone will switch to it. As systemd was created by only one guy far less good at programming than you, you should be able to do it. Finger in the nose. During the night. And I wonder why you didn't did it yet. Maybe you are not as good as your claims? > and should have been strangled in the cradle. But dupes like you have > kept it alive to wreak its destruction. Do best and systemd will go in history books. Just brag as you only know and it will stay on the computers. It's your choice. -- Si vous avez du temps à perdre : https://scarpet42.gitlab.io