Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us1.netnews.com!not-for-mail
X-Trace: DXC=bIATMA282@ZITXUL480YCWU5[F2hIijD_7J470dMQQ7[J4R`5ADBYnRCODD059b9o_1A?EK]8;W0[E<deGDEOF`]f@HSLgR[]oX7dKkgDfTED\iJPUY0^i>7V
X-Complaints-To: support@frugalusenet.com
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 16:02:38 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: OT: 'Peer Reviewed' Papers - a new scam!
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
References: <v333v5$4hl8$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: bitrex <user@example.net>
In-Reply-To: <v333v5$4hl8$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <6656385e$6$1258324$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: 1716926558 reader.netnews.com 1258324 127.0.0.1:45415
Bytes: 2112

On 5/27/2024 7:11 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> "This ongoing degradation calls for a shift from traditional peer review
> to rigorous live debates, ensuring accountability by having people argue
> their cases in real time."
> 
> And not before time, say I.
> 
> 
> https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/trust-sciencethat-just-retracted-11000-
> peer-reviewed-papers


I'm unsure if there have been any significant recent developments in 
conservative philosophy recently, but if there's been like, some 
paradigm-shifting discoveries in the field of wingnutology I'm open to 
reading the journals that contain them.

But my impression has been that wingnutology is not shall we say a 
"highly nuanced philosophy" and that's one of the keys to its 
popularity, it doesn't need an academic journal to understand.

Love guns, love Trump, have a long list of commies, queers, and 
degenerate enemies that need to get waxed, and you've basically got at 
least a bachelors of arts in the field at this time. what more is there 
to know about it. Park your pickup in a EV parking spot is the 
equivalent of a masters degree. Kick a queer or homeless person straight 
in the head and you got your PhD, easy.