Path: ...!news.nobody.at!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed3-a.proxad.net!nnrp4-1.free.fr!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: =?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane?= CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr>
Subject: Re: Why Unicode is Shit
References: <17d8f953df0055c6$92217$3210899$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
 <666ccf64$0$7511$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
 <17d922cf764cace6$338103$533214$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
Organization: Mulots' Killer
User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 15 Jun 2024 12:58:43 GMT
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <666d9003$0$8221$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Jun 2024 14:58:43 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.201.248.7
X-Trace: 1718456323 news-3.free.fr 8221 78.201.248.7:57256
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Bytes: 2740

Le 15-06-2024, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> a écrit :
> On 14 Jun 2024 23:16:52 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>> 
>>> Unicode should be a project for millennia
>> 
>> In fact, it is.
>> 
>
> Nah.  The whole world should speak English.  In fact, English
> is already the universal language for Internet communication.

That's another great one: you never stopped, it's impressive. Any good
programmers try to solve an issue, and you proved, once again, you are
not a good programme: you can only avoid issues.

And once again, when a subject you launched is beyond your limited
intellectual abilities, you have to change it. But you are not smart
enough to do it correctly. So you switch from an issue showing you can't
explain why unicode is poorly designed to an issue showing you can't
explain why unicode is useless.

> So why insist on this Unicode "Tower of Babel?"  Just have
> the whole world speak English and the problem is forever solved.

You could ask any linguist, but it would be too difficult for you to
understand their answers.

Some people, unlike you, are not stuck in the past, but study the past
and they need to write extinct languages already written. You can ask
someone dead thousands years ago to learn a language which didn't exist
at the time of his death.

And, once again, you are unable to understand the clues I gave you and
you removed them. Because, even if the clue could help you prove the
unicode will be saturated in some time, you are stuck in the past.
English speakers are using emoji and they need more than ASCII
characters to display them.

> It's going to be a fun future.

You are not part of the future, you are part of the past.

-- 
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io