Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<6677e16f$1$11724$426a74cc@news.free.fr>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed2-b.proxad.net!nnrp3-2.free.fr!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Reply-To: jjlxa31@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 10:48:47 +0200
References: <693b1f71c994c268d60983eb81fc6aaa@www.novabbs.com> <6675e44b$0$11435$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <30afac2dd572fd4a163ff412d969e17d@www.novabbs.com> <667698af$0$3329$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <ldobecFpb8bU1@mid.individual.net>
Organization: De Ster
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <6677e16f$1$11724$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Jun 2024 10:48:47 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.10.137.58
X-Trace: 1719132527 news-1.free.fr 11724 213.10.137.58:52284
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Bytes: 2134

Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On 2024-06-22 09:26:07 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
> 
> > LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
> > 
> >> It will take more than vacuous denials if you want to be convincing.
> >> Try this:
> >> "FRAMING HYPOTHESES: Conceptions of gravity in the 18th and 19th
> >> centuries"
> >> Frans van Lunteren c.1991
> > 
> > In the 18th century they already knew
> > that gravity is caused
> > by the accumulation of phlogiston.
> > 
> > See: "Flogiston en andere nieuwlichterij" (Frans van Lunteren)
> > <https://dwc.knaw.nl/column-flogiston-en-andere-nieuwlichterij-frans-van-lun
teren/> 
> > 
> > for an up to date reference,
> > (learn Dutch first to keep you busy)
> 
> Not necessary. Google Translate does a good job with Dutch.

I know, it was just a random hit.
Most of the writings of Van Lunteren are in English.

I thought it very strange that our Laurence
quotes a work by a philosopher/historian of science
about fumblings for theories from two hundred years ago
as if it is a research work with relevance for today's research,

Jan