Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fdn.fr!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!212.27.60.64.MISMATCH!cleanfeed3-b.proxad.net!nnrp1-1.free.fr!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Reply-To: jjlxa31@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 10:57:55 +0200
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <FlDiO.56506$GVTf.837@fx01.ams4>
Organization: De Ster
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <668baa12$2$3285$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 08 Jul 2024 10:57:54 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.10.137.58
X-Trace: 1720429074 news-4.free.fr 3285 213.10.137.58:57440
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Bytes: 1316

Paul B. Andersen <relativity@paulba.no> wrote:

> Den 04.07.2024 15:30, skrev Richard Hachel:
> > Langevin's paradox.
> > The Langevin paradox is a very serious criticism against the theory of
> > relativity.
> 
> Langvin's paradox is another name of the "twin paradox".
> In 1911 Langevin gave an example of said "paradox".

Yes, but the French are often excessively chauvinistic.
Nothing is to be taken seriously
unless a French name can be tagged onto it.

Jan