Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<668bf6f5$0$3878$426a34cc@news.free.fr>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!cleanfeed3-a.proxad.net!nnrp3-2.free.fr!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Reply-To: jjlxa31@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 16:25:59 +0200
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <FlDiO.56506$GVTf.837@fx01.ams4> <668baa12$2$3285$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <v6ghgi$rfqg$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: De Ster
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <668bf6f5$0$3878$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 08 Jul 2024 16:25:58 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.10.137.58
X-Trace: 1720448758 news-4.free.fr 3878 213.10.137.58:58144
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Bytes: 2540

Python <python@invalid.org> wrote:

> Le 08/07/2024 à 10:57, J. J. Lodder a écrit :
> > Paul B. Andersen <relativity@paulba.no> wrote:
> > 
> >> Den 04.07.2024 15:30, skrev Richard Hachel:
> >>> Langevin's paradox.
> >>> The Langevin paradox is a very serious criticism against the theory of
> >>> relativity.
> >>
> >> Langvin's paradox is another name of the "twin paradox".
> >> In 1911 Langevin gave an example of said "paradox".
> > 
> > Yes, but the French are often excessively chauvinistic.
> 
> Lengrand (aka Hachel) is. A quite ridiculous one. Most French
> are not, obviously (look at the election results :-) )

What makes you believe that the French left and the centre
are not chauvinistic?

> > Nothing is to be taken seriously
> > unless a French name can be tagged onto it.
> 
> Fact it that the twin paradox has been pointed out first
> by the French communist Paul Langevin, who was very close
> with the French/Polish twice nobel prize winner Marie Curie.

Not really, it is already explicitly in Einstein 1905.
Langevin merely invented a more dramatic hypothetical example.

And more not really, Langevin was in the first place an anti-fascist.
He didn't become a communist party member until 1944,
shortly before his death in 1946.

> Even in France, I would say especially in France, the absurd
> theory that Einstein plagiarized Poincaré has been debunked
> strongly.

There never was any basis for that beyond anti-Einstein sentiment.
Idem for the Lorentz-plagiarising,

Jan