Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<668bf6f5$0$3878$426a34cc@news.free.fr> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!cleanfeed3-a.proxad.net!nnrp3-2.free.fr!not-for-mail Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) Reply-To: jjlxa31@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 16:25:59 +0200 References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <FlDiO.56506$GVTf.837@fx01.ams4> <668baa12$2$3285$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <v6ghgi$rfqg$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: De Ster Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6) Lines: 44 Message-ID: <668bf6f5$0$3878$426a34cc@news.free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Date: 08 Jul 2024 16:25:58 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.10.137.58 X-Trace: 1720448758 news-4.free.fr 3878 213.10.137.58:58144 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Bytes: 2540 Python <python@invalid.org> wrote: > Le 08/07/2024 à 10:57, J. J. Lodder a écrit : > > Paul B. Andersen <relativity@paulba.no> wrote: > > > >> Den 04.07.2024 15:30, skrev Richard Hachel: > >>> Langevin's paradox. > >>> The Langevin paradox is a very serious criticism against the theory of > >>> relativity. > >> > >> Langvin's paradox is another name of the "twin paradox". > >> In 1911 Langevin gave an example of said "paradox". > > > > Yes, but the French are often excessively chauvinistic. > > Lengrand (aka Hachel) is. A quite ridiculous one. Most French > are not, obviously (look at the election results :-) ) What makes you believe that the French left and the centre are not chauvinistic? > > Nothing is to be taken seriously > > unless a French name can be tagged onto it. > > Fact it that the twin paradox has been pointed out first > by the French communist Paul Langevin, who was very close > with the French/Polish twice nobel prize winner Marie Curie. Not really, it is already explicitly in Einstein 1905. Langevin merely invented a more dramatic hypothetical example. And more not really, Langevin was in the first place an anti-fascist. He didn't become a communist party member until 1944, shortly before his death in 1946. > Even in France, I would say especially in France, the absurd > theory that Einstein plagiarized Poincaré has been debunked > strongly. There never was any basis for that beyond anti-Einstein sentiment. Idem for the Lorentz-plagiarising, Jan