Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed2-b.proxad.net!nnrp6-1.free.fr!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Approximately 300,000 km/s With Respect To What?
From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Reply-To: jjlxa31@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 09:33:58 +0200
References: <v6pdg9$2k01g$1@dont-email.me> <v6qssk$2vb8b$1@dont-email.me> <lfer0bF3dlmU1@mid.individual.net> <v708nu$3mln$1@dont-email.me> <lfjtovFqneaU1@mid.individual.net> <v72oo9$ko8j$1@dont-email.me> <lfmlkfF7umpU10@mid.individual.net> <v786b8$1psia$1@dont-email.me> <lfrqhlF22urU3@mid.individual.net> <E89td6du78wfm2OXKZAD6KQeYyY@jntp> <lfut2kFfohpU9@mid.individual.net> <rp2ObOnNm5Uis6lq153gZKZa-KM@jntp> <lg13i1Fq3poU8@mid.individual.net> <v7ggcp$3hi7e$3@dont-email.me> <lg3q51F8fpmU6@mid.individual.net> <v7ioj3$101u$2@dont-email.me> <lg698vFkc14U4@mid.individual.net> <v7lfqv$khru$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: De Ster
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <669f5ce5$0$7515$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Jul 2024 09:33:57 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.10.137.58
X-Trace: 1721720037 news-1.free.fr 7515 213.10.137.58:52224
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Bytes: 4141

Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote:

> On 2024-07-22 05:33:26 +0000, Thomas Heger said:
> 
> > Am Sonntag000021, 21.07.2024 um 13:36 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
> >> W dniu 21.07.2024 o 12:40, Python pisze:
> >>> Le 21/07/2024 à 09:03, Thomas Heger a écrit :
> >>>> Am Samstag000020, 20.07.2024 um 16:08 schrieb Python:
> >>>> ...
> >>>>>> The number of errors in einstein's paper is also extremely large, hence
> >>>>>> that 'system' would need permanent control over large parts of science.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Also a mechanism for sanctions against dissidents would be useful.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> But for what reasons would any system take such an amount of efforts???
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Certainly something not very beneficial, because otherwise we would be
> >>>>>> told about it.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Even as fond you are to pathetically stupid "theories" (growing Earth,
> >>>>> Hitler is a British spy, etc.) you seem to realize, somewhat, how
> >>>>> stupid your claims are?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> There is a far simpler way to explain everything
> >>>>> - There are no significant mistakes in Einstein's article
> >>>> 
> >>>> This is actually a counterfactual 'sanction'!
> >>>> 
> >>>> You didn't even mention my 'annotated version of SRT' and the 400+
> >>>> errors I have found in Einstein's paper.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Here it is:
> >>>> 
> >>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RkhX-B5u7X4ga0QH-C53RddjQGctZVdo/view
> >>>> 
> >>>> If you think, that I made 400+ errors myself, than please show at least
> >>>> a single one.
> >>> 
> >>> Come on, Thomas. A lot of yours claims there has been extensively
> >>> debunked here, by me and others.
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
> >> to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
> >> would be, and he has written it clearly
> >> enough for anyone able to read (even if not
> >> clearly enough for you, poor stinker).
> > 
> > Poincare was a mathematician and a very good one.
> > 
> > He wandered into physics, because he was dealing with the Lorentz 
> > transformation and with Maxwells equations.

So you got that wrong too. (can't you ever get anything right?)
Poincaré, like Einstein, was an engineer by training.
(Ecole Polytechnique, Ecole des Mines)
He also worked as an engineer for much of his life,
in mining, beside his work as a mathematician.
He wandered into mathematics from there, not the other way round.
He was first of all a thoroughly practical man, just like Einstein.

> And the practical problem of synchronization of clocks at diffrent locations.

[sorry about replying over your head, missing article on my server]

Jan