Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fdn.fr!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!cleanfeed1-b.proxad.net!nnrp2-1.free.fr!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Approximately 300,000 km/s With Respect To What?
From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Reply-To: jjlxa31@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 10:25:48 +0200
References: <v6pdg9$2k01g$1@dont-email.me> <v6qssk$2vb8b$1@dont-email.me> <lfer0bF3dlmU1@mid.individual.net> <v708nu$3mln$1@dont-email.me> <lfjtovFqneaU1@mid.individual.net> <v72oo9$ko8j$1@dont-email.me> <lfmlkfF7umpU10@mid.individual.net> <v786b8$1psia$1@dont-email.me> <lfrqhlF22urU3@mid.individual.net> <E89td6du78wfm2OXKZAD6KQeYyY@jntp> <lfut2kFfohpU9@mid.individual.net> <rp2ObOnNm5Uis6lq153gZKZa-KM@jntp> <lg13i1Fq3poU8@mid.individual.net> <v7ggcp$3hi7e$3@dont-email.me> <lg3q51F8fpmU6@mid.individual.net> <v7ioj3$101u$2@dont-email.me> <lg698vFkc14U4@mid.individual.net> <v7lfqv$khru$1@dont-email.me> <669f5ce5$0$7515$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <lgbkasFeb1hU7@mid.individual.net> <66a0cbe2$0$7521$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <lgebccF7d7tU5@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: De Ster
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Lines: 130
Message-ID: <66a20c0b$0$18434$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Jul 2024 10:25:47 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.10.137.58
X-Trace: 1721895947 news-3.free.fr 18434 213.10.137.58:53588
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Bytes: 6701

Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:

> Am Mittwoch000024, 24.07.2024 um 11:39 schrieb J. J. Lodder:
> > Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
> > 
> >> Am Dienstag000023, 23.07.2024 um 09:33 schrieb J. J. Lodder:
> >>> Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 2024-07-22 05:33:26 +0000, Thomas Heger said:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Am Sonntag000021, 21.07.2024 um 13:36 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
> >>>>>> W dniu 21.07.2024 o 12:40, Python pisze:
> >>>>>>> Le 21/07/2024 à 09:03, Thomas Heger a écrit :
> >>>>>>>> Am Samstag000020, 20.07.2024 um 16:08 schrieb Python:
> >>>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>>>> The number of errors in einstein's paper is also extremely large,
> >>>>>>>>>> hence that 'system' would need permanent control over large parts
> >>>>>>>>>> of science.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Also a mechanism for sanctions against dissidents would be
> >>>>>>>>>> useful.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> But for what reasons would any system take such an amount of
> >>>>>>>>>> efforts???
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Certainly something not very beneficial, because otherwise we
> >>>>>>>>>> would be told about it.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Even as fond you are to pathetically stupid "theories" (growing
> >>>>>>>>> Earth, Hitler is a British spy, etc.) you seem to realize,
> >>>>>>>>> somewhat, how stupid your claims are?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> There is a far simpler way to explain everything
> >>>>>>>>> - There are no significant mistakes in Einstein's article
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This is actually a counterfactual 'sanction'!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You didn't even mention my 'annotated version of SRT' and the 400+
> >>>>>>>> errors I have found in Einstein's paper.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Here it is:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RkhX-B5u7X4ga0QH-C53RddjQGctZVdo/vie
w
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If you think, that I made 400+ errors myself, than please show at
> >>>>>>>> least a single one.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Come on, Thomas. A lot of yours claims there has been extensively
> >>>>>>> debunked here, by me and others.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
> >>>>>> to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
> >>>>>> would be, and he has written it clearly
> >>>>>> enough for anyone able to read (even if not
> >>>>>> clearly enough for you, poor stinker).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Poincare was a mathematician and a very good one.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> He wandered into physics, because he was dealing with the Lorentz
> >>>>> transformation and with Maxwells equations.
> >>>
> >>> So you got that wrong too. (can't you ever get anything right?)
> >>> Poincaré, like Einstein, was an engineer by training.
> >>
> >> Einstein was actually teacher from training.
> > 
> > More nonsense.
> > Einstein graduated from the ETH Zurich as an engineer, period,
> > just like any other engineer.
> > They didn't have 'teaching only' degrees. [1]
> 
> I have read, that Einstein got a degree as teacher for physics.
> 
> But, as a matter of fact, I cannot proof this and it is also of little
> interest for me.

Yes, this was just another of your self-invented 'facts'.

> > What is true is that Einstein prefered the general physics courses,
> > and that he avoided specialised subjects as much as possible.
> > He was, and wanted to be a generalist.
> > It seems plausible that he got his job at the patent office
> > precisely because of that.
> 
> I have regarded it as questionable, that stateless foreigners could work
> in an 'Amt', where usually only born citizens could work (because the
> Patentamt was security critical).

Einstein wasn't a stateless foreigner, he was a Swiss citizen,
and had been that since 1901.
And he had an academic degree from a Swiss university
that qualified him for the job.

That 'born citizens only' thing is
just another of your self-invented non-facts.

> My conclusion from this was, that Einstein WAS in fact born in 
> Swizzerland and his CV therefore a fake.
> 
> Why Swizzerland did that and why they tried to derail common science,
> that is a riddle for me.

Whatever the data, you will without fail arrive at the wrong comclusion.
You are as useful for direction finding as a broken compass
that never points north. If you say something it must be wrong.

> Possibly the Swiss had developed something useful, like a time machine
> or device to synthesize Gold, which they wanted to have exclusively.
> 
> 
> >> That Poincaré was an engineer was new for me.
> > 
> > This is typical of you. You proclaim all kinds of things
> > without bothering for a moment to look at readily available sources
> > for even a little amount of fact check,
> 
> Well, you always have some gaps in what you know.
> 
> About Poincaré and his personal life I have actually very few informations.
> 
> But what exactly are you trying to prove with this´?

That you are a complete idiot.
Certainly you could have seen that for yourself?

Jan