| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<66bcf262$0$717$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 14:07:31 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: New VSI post on Youtube
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
References: <v9ehs5$3mqbj$1@dont-email.me> <v9idff$f9k4$1@dont-email.me>
<v9iqln$hrs3$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=C3=B8j?= <arne@vajhoej.dk>
In-Reply-To: <v9iqln$hrs3$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <66bcf262$0$717$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Organization: SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source
NNTP-Posting-Host: a5dd062a.news.sunsite.dk
X-Trace: 1723658850 news.sunsite.dk 717 arne@vajhoej.dk/68.14.27.188:49858
X-Complaints-To: staff@sunsite.dk
Bytes: 3337
On 8/14/2024 1:48 PM, Simon Clubley wrote:
> On 2024-08-14, Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote:
>> On 8/12/2024 10:53 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>> Oracle and VMS Software on Application Development and Migration to x86:
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmLEI5O1JSw
>>>
>>> I have not seen & heard it all yet.
>>>
>>> Somewhere in the middle they summarize the status of the x86-64 port
>>> as: 8920 tests succeed + 271 tests fail + 608 test not run yet.
>>
>> Did this get lost in all the spam filters?
>>
>> I guess a YouTube link does look like spam, but ...
>>
>
> I did see this the first time around, but had nothing to say at the time.
>
> However, since you ask, I prefer a writeup rather than a 40 minute video
> for this kind of update, but based on the numbers above, they are making
> good progress but are not there yet.
I 100% agree.
There is a link to the slide decks on Youtube.
> Based on the above, I would guess/hope early next year for them to be ready,
> which would put them a year behind schedule. It would be interesting to
> know the reasons for the failures however and what is different about the
> x86-64 environment that resulted in test differences that ended up being
> classified as failures.
>
> In total, there's about 10% of the tests which have not been done or have
> failed, but as we all know the first 90% of a project takes 90% of the
> time and the last 10% takes the other 90% of the time. :-)
Slide 39 says H1CY2025 so "early next year".
The slides list some of the challenges they had.
In my poor wording:
* like everybody else they had to start with cross compilers
and then switch to native compilers
* they need to generate native code, so they needed to get
GEM2LLVM and LLVM backends from VSI and integrate them
* like everybody else they got problems with C++ code because
clang is not compatible with traditional VMS C++
* they relied on some tools build with VAX SCAN and first
VESTed and later AESTed - since no IEST exist they had to
rewrite those tools (in Java)
The slides does not say so, but it is probably a huge code base
and given that some of it is 4 decades old, then there may be some
hacks in the code.
Oracle DB - what is known as Oracle Classic in the VMS world:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18442941
:-)
Arne