Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<66c3c100@news.ausics.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Message-ID: <66c3c100@news.ausics.net> From: not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) Subject: Re: Using Debian to manage a multiple OS machine Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc References: <v9ibk5$qcj$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <P4mdnbCYM_pktV37nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com> <v9ppp3$lv7l$1@news1.tnib.de> <66c12e40@news.ausics.net> <v9taqq$s3kh$1@news1.tnib.de> <66c2765b@news.ausics.net> <v9uoos$ukvi$1@news1.tnib.de> User-Agent: tin/2.0.1-20111224 ("Achenvoir") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.31 (i586)) NNTP-Posting-Host: news.ausics.net Date: 20 Aug 2024 08:02:41 +1000 Organization: Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net Lines: 26 X-Complaints: abuse@ausics.net Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.bbs.nz!news.ausics.net!not-for-mail Bytes: 1766 Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> wrote: > not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) wrote: >>Fighting buggy scripts, that's hard. > > Those scripts are in use on millions of installations millions of > times daily. They can hardly be unusably buggy. Most aren't multi-boot installations. Anyway, if you accept that writing menu.lst entries wasn't hard, why adopt a bootloader that requires those scripts in the first place? They're just another point of failure, and no I'm not going to be convinced against personal experience that it's an impossible point of failure. >>Old Grub just did >>what you asked it to, like Syslinux/Extlinux mercifully still do. > > In my world, using exotic solutions without pressing reason is > considered a technical liability. Yes well I install Linux on personal PCs instead of Windows or MacOS, so that battle is already completely lost in the eyes of many. -- __ __ #_ < |\| |< _#