Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: origin of biological chirality?
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:16:04 +0200
Organization: De Ster
Lines: 35
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <66c6e5b3$0$3692$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
References: <v9rai1$22tkd$1@dont-email.me> <9u94cjl2fv6heurev0aa1mqmcrslj3evv6@4ax.com>
Reply-To: jjlxa31@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="64776"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Return-Path: <root@news.free.fr>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
	id E9C7522986F; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 03:16:07 -0400 (EDT)
	by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC70E22978C
	for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 03:16:05 -0400 (EDT)
	id BF4B6872A8; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 03:16:05 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
	by mod-relay.zaccari.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97ABF7FC26
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 03:16:05 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mod-relay.zaccari.net 97ABF7FC26
	by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 3606B2003F2
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:16:03 +0200 (CEST)
	Thu, 22 Aug 2024 07:16:03 -0000
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Aug 2024 09:16:03 CEST
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.10.137.58
X-Original-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Bytes: 3465

Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> wrote:

> On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 00:08:49 +0100, the following appeared
> in talk.origins, posted by Ernest Major
> <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk>:
> 
> >A study has found that lipid membranes can be selectively permeable to
> >one or the other sugar or amino acid enantiomer. The study used membrane
> >models inspired by the membranes of modern organisms, so is not directly
> >relevant to abiogenesis. However it still raises the possibility that
> >membrane selectivity was the source of chirality in biological 
> >molecules. One possible issue is does this effect require chiral 
> >membrane lipids; if so it only move the question of the origin of 
> >chirality from sugars and amino acids to lipids.
> >
> ISTM that this is similar to the "matter/antimatter"
> imbalance; neither is inherently more "natural" than the
> other, but one became more prevalent. And IIRC, the m/am
> imbalance is now assumed to be a matter of chance in the
> original ratio. I could; of course, be mistaken in that;
> it's been years since I followed it even casually.
> >
> >https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.04.23.590732v2.full.pdf

It isn't. The left-handed molecules can be converted into right-handed
ones, and vica versa, by taking them apart and reassembling them.
For matter/antimatter there is no such possibility.
Disassembling doesn't help,
because you cannot turn antiquarks into quarks.
 
Biological chirality is a triviality,
the matter/antimatter imbalance is a deep problem.
Where has all that antimatter gone?

Jan