Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<66d8ba09$1$1279$426a74cc@news.free.fr> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: New SETI search Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 21:50:32 +0200 Organization: De Ster Lines: 95 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <66d8ba09$1$1279$426a74cc@news.free.fr> References: <vaj062$2kr3d$1@dont-email.me> <menqcj1270ta8rjtmasodqi5nkier8rnhl@4ax.com> <vb5odm$31ra3$1@dont-email.me> <66d76825$0$8230$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <sgsedjt0vjt7qi3c1ip4v4a8i3nqi1tnoh@4ax.com> Reply-To: jjlxa31@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder) Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="59945"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6) To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Return-Path: <root@news.free.fr> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id 70E8322986F; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 15:50:30 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A66222978C for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 15:50:28 -0400 (EDT) id A6C28872AC; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 15:50:36 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org by mod-relay.zaccari.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FEC3872A6 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 15:50:35 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mod-relay.zaccari.net 7FEC3872A6 by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id A0CBB13F8C8 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 21:50:33 +0200 (CEST) Wed, 04 Sep 2024 19:50:33 -0000 Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 Sep 2024 21:50:33 CEST X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.10.137.58 X-Original-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Bytes: 6110 Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> wrote: > On Tue, 3 Sep 2024 21:48:53 +0200, the following appeared in > talk.origins, posted by nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. > Lodder): > > >Mark Isaak <specimenNOSPAM@curioustaxon.omy.net> wrote: > > > >> On 8/26/24 10:24 PM, El Kabong wrote: > >> > RonO wrote: > >> > > >> >> A group is using the Murchison wide field array to monitor for super > >> >> civilizations in other galaxies. The civilizations would have to be > >> >> super advanced in order to generate the 100 MHz signal that they are > >> >> scanning for. Huge amounts of energy would have to be channeled into > >> >> transmission of such signals. Would we ever expend such an effort to > >> >> tell someone in another galaxy that we exist? 100 MHz is in the middle > >> >> of the FM radio band, but in our expanding universe what would have been > >> >> the frequency transmitted by any one of the 2,800 galaxies scanned in > >> >> the survey? > >> >> > >> >> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/08/240826131354.htm > >> >> > >> >> Ron Okimoto > >> > > >> > Previous searches at Aricebo and other sites looked for > >> > alien signals at 1420 Mhz. They picked that frequency > >> > because it is a hydrogen line. The thinking is that > >> > aliens would more likely broadcast there than an > >> > arbitrary frequency. It never made sense to me because > >> > the signal will be attenuated by any hydrogen lying in > >> > the path, and because if you tune in to the hydrogen > >> > line, you'll find... hydrogen noise! > >> > > >> > Maybe space aliens will broadcast on 100 Mhz because it's > >> > a nice round number? Then again they might have 3 digits > >> > per hand and use a base-6 system and think 60.466176 Mhz > >> > is a nice round number where other hexadigits would > >> > listen. In any case you have to pick a frequency > >> > somewhere. > >> > > >> > The article you cited does link to an article on a > >> > previous survey done in 2020, but it doesn't mention the > >> > frequency. > >> > > >> > If the aliens transmit from a large phased array like > >> > MWA, they could transmit a large effective power within > >> > the beamwidth, without actually transmitting huge power. > >> > But the beam has to be aimed in our direction. Maybe > >> > they send signals periodically in every direction. > >> > Similarly the MWA has to have its array pointed in the > >> > right direction at the right time. > >> > > >> > The chances are slim, but worth trying. > >> > >> If I had vast technological resources and wanted to send an "I'm here" > >> signal to unknown aliens over potentially vast distances, I wouldn't > >> generate light. That would take way too much energy, especially if it > >> was broadcast widely. Instead, I would rig up some opaque sheets and set > >> them orbiting around a star, with gaps in places so that anyone watching > >> from the plane of orbit would see a dit-dah message spelled out > >> repeating every 6 (of our) months or so. It would work only on a fairly > >> narrow plane, but at least it's better than a laser pointed at a single > >> target. > >> > >> Is SETI set up to look for anything like that? > > > >Why would they waste resources on that? > >Any search for exoplanets will find such a signal. > >As a matter of fact somthing very much like it has already been found. > >(six planets around the star HD 110067 > > locked in periodic perfect 3/2 and 4/3 resonances) > >No design involved. > > > True. But one could make it arbitrarily complex, with > essentially zero probability of it being natural. Have you seen 'The Ringworld Engineers'? > >> Of course, I would never do anything to attract strangers until I was > >> more than confidence that my technology could overpower any hostile > >> aliens I might attract. If possible, I would set up the signal several > >> hundred light-years away from concentrations of my species' population. > > > >You are American, I presume? > > > Why do you assume that? No need to presume, in your case, Jan