Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<67099f2f@news.ausics.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Message-ID: <67099f2f@news.ausics.net> From: not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) Subject: Re: GNOME/Freedesktop/redhat incompetent or malicious influence Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc References: <pan$bad8$b677bed3$aca0e5e2$5bb3eab5@linux.rocks> <lmjll1Fd52kU2@mid.individual.net> <slrnvgb2cp.5v0f.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <ve4go1$3ra8a$3@dont-email.me> <pan$4209e$40d36e28$c8a7c079$163ec1ab@linux.rocks> <ve5v74$2ld1n$1@dont-email.me> <ve85ik$muck$1@news1.tnib.de> <6708495f@news.ausics.net> <veagie$r541$1@news1.tnib.de> User-Agent: tin/2.0.1-20111224 ("Achenvoir") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.31 (i586)) NNTP-Posting-Host: news.ausics.net Date: 12 Oct 2024 07:57:04 +1000 Organization: Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net Lines: 21 X-Complaints: abuse@ausics.net Path: ...!news.snarked.org!news.bbs.nz!news.ausics.net!not-for-mail Bytes: 1848 Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> wrote: > not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) wrote: >>I would prefer a free OS funded by lots of organisations putting a >>little money in, rather than relying on a few companies that invest >>a lot and whose individual opinions therefore matter. But beggers >>can't be choosers (although I can still choose old versions of >>Linux, like I'm using now, for some things). > > So you're doing your own security? Or do you just not care about being > vulnerable? I run a firewall that blocks inbound connections from the internet, and I don't run JS-supporting web browsers on them so no random JS hacking about at old browser vulnerabilities. If you wanted to take that approach for an internet server then "doing your own security" would be a more meaningful commitment, although the CIP supported kernels are a good starting point. -- __ __ #_ < |\| |< _#