Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating
 itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 07:20:03 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <670f7ef992822bded21586661797b0604ca005cd@i2pn2.org>
References: <vhdd32$oq0l$1@dont-email.me> <vhe9rl$ue1m$2@dont-email.me>
 <254d3e7be0462ba8225ec0eb4804941ea635770d@i2pn2.org>
 <vheecn$12v3p$1@dont-email.me>
 <031e34cbeacc2a7b5145fd1f25ccee588e8cfb43@i2pn2.org>
 <vhg1oe$1cfbe$2@dont-email.me>
 <aa621f0677187fad3eb5b7f20715247c3ffbd61e@i2pn2.org>
 <vhg39s$1csnf$1@dont-email.me>
 <b4aade7ae93d862bd313e00abe20deab78124e18@i2pn2.org>
 <vhg7jg$1dmht$1@dont-email.me>
 <d8a9608b7ae74fde0e364d794faeeed25dd2e227@i2pn2.org>
 <vhi881$1sm67$1@dont-email.me>
 <2c3e624c991637a3350c0eb050fb5632df5fe615@i2pn2.org>
 <vhifre$1u57l$1@dont-email.me>
 <49e04fa1fbc3a9414b5cacddc540db04173a48ea@i2pn2.org>
 <vhjktl$28t3s$4@dont-email.me>
 <8de8d688b88417adb39846c9da6e6ec3a7dbedbc@i2pn2.org>
 <vhlmdk$9l59$3@dont-email.me>
 <fe52ac9eef22e81f4ae88936e070e16dce87ba55@i2pn2.org>
 <vhm6g9$c0mm$1@dont-email.me>
 <230213d441f0b0c3a316229689547d12ed5bdf0a@i2pn2.org>
 <vhmacd$g9i3$1@dont-email.me>
 <600de8c9105b101f72862c4a8e080b4da11e7767@i2pn2.org>
 <vhmfr1$gt74$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 12:20:04 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3486389"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <vhmfr1$gt74$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 5873
Lines: 106

On 11/21/24 12:18 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 11/20/2024 10:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 11/20/24 10:45 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 11/20/2024 8:47 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 11/20/24 9:39 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> What I say is proven true by the meaning of its words
>>>>> and you lie about this condemning yourself to actual Hell.
>>>>
>>>> No, and you have shown you don't KNOW the meaning of the words, 
>>>> because you are using "Terms of Art" in an art that you are just 
>>>> ignorant of.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> DDD emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its "return"
>>>>> instruction final halt state.
>>>>
>>>> Which is an invalid criteria for a decider, and even invalid for 
>>>> saying "never"
>>>>
>>>
>>> THAT IS NOT THE SAME AS SAYING IT IS FALSE.
>>
>> It surely isn't true, which is what you need it to be.
>>
> 
> Of course it is true. I just don't get it why you want to
> condemn yourself to Hell over this. Are you a fake Christian?

It isn't a valid condition to talk about for a decider, so just like the 
Liar's Paradox, it is untrue.

I am not condemning myself, as what I speak is from the truth. Your 
problem is you have shown you don't really understand what truth is, you 
know some of the words, but not what they mean, so you don't follow the 
truth.

You have demonstrated that you are just a pagan, as you think you are 
God, so you can't be a Christian.

> 
>> I guees you are just admitting that you are nothing but a lying 
>> hypocrite.
>>
> 
> I haven't even made a mistake, you are the one that is.
> Anyone can tell that by the inconsistency of your answers.

Yes you have made many mistakes. You have even admitted to them, thus 
your statement is just a blatant lie.

Everyone sees that it is YOUR logic that is inconsistent, things like 
HHH is one program that we can run, and HHH is an infinite set of programs.

You logic is just based on equivocation, fallacies, and lies.

> 
>>>
>>>> Your HHH shows that the behavior of DDD doesn't YET reach the return 
>>>> instruction in the part of its behavior emulated by HHH, but it DOES 
>>>> reach their under the ACTUAL DEFINITION of the behavior of DDD, that 
>>>> HHH MUST ANSWER ABOUT, or your whole arguement is just based on lies.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That you say this is untrue is a despicable lie and
>>>>> you know it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No, Because your statement is just NONSENSE.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No Jackass it is not nonsense. You may be a condemned
>>> to actual Hell liar for saying that it is nonsense.
>>> Here is actual nonsense: "f4(nmr rgfm59 mn98B"
>>
>> Yes, it is nonsense, as it is making a category error.
>>
>> You just don't understand the words you are using, and your insistance 
>> on incorrect statements is just proving you are nothing but a liar.
>>
>>>
>>>>> That it is true and seems irrelevant to you would not
>>>>> be a lie. You seem to prefer to lie.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No, you are just proving you are nothing but a pathological  liar 
>>>> because you refuse to learn what you words mean.
>>>
>>> That you call a point of view that is merely different
>>> than the conventional point of view "nonsense" or a "lie"
>>> IS A LIE THAT MAY GET YOU CONDEMNED TO ACTUAL HELL.
>>>
>>
>> IT isn't a "point of view" but a failure to meet the objective 
>> requirements of the system you are stuck in.
>>
>> IT seems that YOU are the one condemned to hell, and Satan has you so 
>> buffaloed that you don't see it coming.
>>
>> Once he got you to brainwash yourself to not even look at the correct 
>> definitions, he had you in the bag, as you are just unable to 
>> understand the truth, which mean he also cut you off from the possible 
>> solution to your problems, so you don't actually beleive in the right 
>> way of how truth works.
> 
>