Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<674784c0@news.ausics.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Message-ID: <674784c0@news.ausics.net> From: not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) Subject: Re: terminal only for two weeks Newsgroups: comp.misc References: <67447ce1$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <vi3ecs$35u53$1@dont-email.me> <6c4ae24b-7bb8-7d84-8f74-1f5fc14c0ec0@example.net> <87ed2yjkl8.fsf@tilde.institute> <55db8483-58f0-c3dc-de0b-7f44881fa180@example.net> <67464333@news.ausics.net> <d5614852-aa8a-639f-9b91-54744fff04cc@example.net> User-Agent: tin/2.0.1-20111224 ("Achenvoir") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.31 (i586)) NNTP-Posting-Host: news.ausics.net Date: 28 Nov 2024 06:44:48 +1000 Organization: Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net Lines: 40 X-Complaints: abuse@ausics.net Path: ...!news.snarked.org!news.bbs.nz!news.ausics.net!not-for-mail Bytes: 2392 D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > On Tue, 27 Nov 2024, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >> D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >>> On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, yeti wrote: >>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >>>>> I have been thinking about moving the reading part of web browsing >>>>> into the terminal as well, but haven't found a browser I'm happy >>>>> with. >>>> >>>> I use Elinks, Emacs/EWW and W3m, but none of them can replace the scary >>>> fullfat browsers. They seem to just fit Smolweb stuff (FTP, Gemini, >>>> Gopher and similar). >>> >>> True. >> >> I like seeing useful images, so prefer Dillo and Links (the latter >> does support display via the framebuffer so you can run it >> graphically without X). > > For some reason, I never managed to get the framebuffer to work. Have no > idea why. =( I would like to get it to work though. I guess the framebuffer is working for the console, otherwise it will probably be a low-res BIOS character display like in DOS. So either a permissions problem or do you know that you need to start Links with the "-g" option? > Dillo was a good tip! > I did play with it for a bit, but then forgot about it. Maybe the reason > was a lack of tabs or buffers. I think links or maybe it was elinks, had a > way for me to replicate tabs or vi buffers in the browser. It was super > convenient! Links doesn't do tabs, eLinks might but I haven't used it much. Dillo has tabs, but isn't great for managing huge numbers of them (although I avoid trying to do that anywhere). -- __ __ #_ < |\| |< _#