Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<674784c0@news.ausics.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Message-ID: <674784c0@news.ausics.net>
From: not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev)
Subject: Re: terminal only for two weeks
Newsgroups: comp.misc
References: <67447ce1$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <vi3ecs$35u53$1@dont-email.me> <6c4ae24b-7bb8-7d84-8f74-1f5fc14c0ec0@example.net> <87ed2yjkl8.fsf@tilde.institute> <55db8483-58f0-c3dc-de0b-7f44881fa180@example.net> <67464333@news.ausics.net> <d5614852-aa8a-639f-9b91-54744fff04cc@example.net>
User-Agent: tin/2.0.1-20111224 ("Achenvoir") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.31 (i586))
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.ausics.net
Date: 28 Nov 2024 06:44:48 +1000
Organization: Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net
Lines: 40
X-Complaints: abuse@ausics.net
Path: ...!news.snarked.org!news.bbs.nz!news.ausics.net!not-for-mail
Bytes: 2392

D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2024, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, yeti wrote:
>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>> I have been thinking about moving the reading part of web browsing
>>>>> into the terminal as well, but haven't found a browser I'm happy
>>>>> with.
>>>>
>>>> I use Elinks, Emacs/EWW and W3m, but none of them can replace the scary
>>>> fullfat browsers.  They seem to just fit Smolweb stuff (FTP, Gemini,
>>>> Gopher and similar).
>>>
>>> True.
>>
>> I like seeing useful images, so prefer Dillo and Links (the latter
>> does support display via the framebuffer so you can run it
>> graphically without X).
> 
> For some reason, I never managed to get the framebuffer to work. Have no 
> idea why. =( I would like to get it to work though.

I guess the framebuffer is working for the console, otherwise it
will probably be a low-res BIOS character display like in DOS. So
either a permissions problem or do you know that you need to start
Links with the "-g" option?

> Dillo was a good tip! 
> I did play with it for a bit, but then forgot about it. Maybe the reason 
> was a lack of tabs or buffers. I think links or maybe it was elinks, had a 
> way for me to replicate tabs or vi buffers in the browser. It was super 
> convenient!

Links doesn't do tabs, eLinks might but I haven't used it much.
Dillo has tabs, but isn't great for managing huge numbers of them
(although I avoid trying to do that anywhere).

-- 
__          __
#_ < |\| |< _#