Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!cleanfeed2-b.proxad.net!nnrp4-1.free.fr!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.
From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Reply-To: jjlxa31@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 12:40:04 +0100
References: <309fb33a3a66f01873fdc890e899a968@www.novabbs.com> <674BCF8E.822@ix.netcom.com> <674CCA90.3DD9@ix.netcom.com> <a89d71ab22cb1e3e279a59fe50ab5ebb@www.novabbs.com> <9f1cd556912a273a8946c77614611242@www.novabbs.com> <8a0014e4135992c8ec7bd3f2f1983164@www.novabbs.com> <d906fde3148d43d339b1663f1127216a@www.novabbs.com> <13877dcc9c6a6f2dd8056d8c05f0c661@www.novabbs.com> <a7d26012926823b22e139af8670cbbe7@www.novabbs.com> <df76d88c3e9729de443afca2c0cf99fa@www.novabbs.com> <2c831e6c7e0103c00fcebe8074fec8db@www.novabbs.com> <7d37d6e841cd1936217b21a5847fc507@www.novabbs.com> <7511bb1b9b748c76df265f91eaaa468a@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: De Ster
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <67503f94$0$12915$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 Dec 2024 12:40:04 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.10.137.58
X-Trace: 1733312404 news-3.free.fr 12915 213.10.137.58:60879
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Bytes: 3584

ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog <tomyee3@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 19:02:45 +0000, rhertz wrote:
> 
> > And I forgot:
> >
> > The settlement of constants BY COLLUSION requires that ALL THE
> > INSTRUMENTATION THAT EXIST (used in any science) BE RE-CALIBRATED, to
> > obey.
> >
> >
> > Do you get this?
> >
> > If you manufacture mass spectrometers, voltmeters, timers, WHATEVER,
> > better that you RE-ADJUST the values that come from measurements.
> >
> > Example: Your voltmeter measures 1 Volt as 0.9995743 OLD Volts? Then
> > RECALIBRATE THAT MF or you will sell NONE. Is that clear?
> >
> > CALIBRATION is an essential part in the design and manufacturing OF ANY
> > INSTRUMENT!. But you require MASTER REFERENCES (OR GUIDELINES LIKE THOSE
> > FROM BIPM).
> >
> > Your laser based distance meter measure 1 meter as 1.00493 meters?
> > RECALIBRATE THE INSTRUMENT RIGHT IN THE PRODUCTION LINE.
> >
> > Not to talk about instrumentation used to compute Atomic Weight or
> > a.m.u.
> >
> > ADJUST, COMPLY AND OBEY OR YOU'RE OUT OF THE BUSINESS.
> >
> > Did you manufacture a single instrument in an university lab? ADJUST,
> > COMPLY AND OBEY or you are OUTCASTED.
> >
> > How do you dare to measure c = 299,793,294 m/s? ARE YOU CRAZY? Adjust
> > the readings to c = 299,792,458 m/s, OR ELSE.
> >
> > And this has been happening since late XIX Century. Read the history
> > behind the definition of 1 Ohm, mainly commanded by British
> > institutions, with Cavendish lab behind it.
> 
> E ≈ 1.0000000 mc^2 is not a calibration adjustment. It is a
> measurement made with calibrated instrumentation whose consistency
> with other instrumentation has been carefully verified by procedures
> such as you cast aspersion upon above.

Was, was, was. There is nothing to 'cast upon' anymore.
With the redefinition of the kilogram in 2018
those measurements have become irrelevant.

E = m c^2 now holds exactly,
by the definition of the kilogram.
(and the Joule)

Jan