Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed2-b.proxad.net!nnrp1-1.free.fr!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Why a time of the real world must be galilean (motion, Mach-ian)
From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Reply-To: jjlxa31@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 15:51:33 +0100
References: <1810396c90cd5e45$3874$1234847$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <u7NvhHcfrBd_GXJLccUViHRQ17g@jntp> <18103c11c4399e1b$3635$1228337$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <ZmSFX2R-ovBoEMObJLiwLJMFGUQ@jntp> <181050bd5e899136$3636$1228337$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <gS3CnAvH7iZAR8z2fpZ16WpwAQI@jntp> <181154a9986e9f2f$4267$1238888$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <WaumABhKFsF-a7vEtKketJC1SU8@jntp> <18115e21819b88b8$3999$1258271$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <wTCUwiP8r_6HV9_JWjpnDzzrCS8@jntp> <1811706c300cfbc4$3891$1234847$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <TOUnAg2Ped0qmfbpGFGHi5K3c70@jntp> <676005cc$0$5206$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <1811a604ad74e4e9$3898$1234847$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <67601ad9$0$16845$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <iH-dnerZ8IKiXP36nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <qvacnZicIKDQaf36nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> <qdGdnQbqPre0Zf36nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <UpWcnfyJpezfUfz6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <vju15c$27duj$1@dont-email.me>
Organization: De Ster
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <676432f5$3$5190$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Dec 2024 15:51:33 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.10.137.58
X-Trace: 1734619893 news-2.free.fr 5190 213.10.137.58:61031
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Bytes: 2577

Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On 2024-12-17 19:08:49 +0000, Ross Finlayson quoted
> 
> 56000 characters of quoted posts in order to post a few lines of comment:
> > 
> > Besides Richardson on electron theory,
> > been reading Tinkham on quantum mechanics.
> > 
> > Similarly to Richardson providing context
> > into what are conventions and then thusly
> > the derivations, Tinkham provides much context
> > and many references to follow.
> 
> Why don't you ever snip anything? It's not worthwhile scrolling through
> line after line of quotations in order to read what may or may not be a
> few words of wisdom.
> 
> I don't think you're as crazy as Wozzie or George Hammond (MS physics,
> Hyannis) or "Dr" Hachel, etc., but in your own way you're just as 
> irritating.

That seems too optimistic an assesment to me,

Jan