Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed4-a.proxad.net!nnrp4-2.free.fr!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: =?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane?= CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr>
Subject: Re: Anyone Using OpenZFS?
References: <pan$cc206$666a7ee5$9c599643$77173a6a@linux.rocks>
 <vlrv05$22rn$1@dont-email.me>
 <pan$deac4$90d03d3d$f254895b$4b89b1ae@linux.rocks>
 <vls0dt$22rn$2@dont-email.me>
 <pan$702f0$c4554836$cd49f73b$97cc73de@linux.rocks>
 <Q8WcnYoJNqZ5nB_6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Organization: Mulots' Killer
User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 11 Jan 2025 12:31:15 GMT
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <67826493$0$548$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Jan 2025 13:31:15 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.201.248.7
X-Trace: 1736598675 news-4.free.fr 548 78.201.248.7:44588
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Bytes: 2547

Le 11-01-2025, 186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> a écrit :
> On 1/10/25 4:00 PM, Farley Flud wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 15:37:17 -0500, Phillip wrote:
>> 
>>>
>>> Probably not without having specific requirements that leverage the ZFS
>>> file system. For example, I use it on a small server to handle RAID1+5
>>> for a business with 10 employees. At home I have no need for that so
>>> EXT4 is the better option for my needs at home.
>>>
>> 
>> OK.  Thanks.
>> 
>> I was just curious but I'll stick with EXT4.

You are right about it.
It's a bad idea to rely on something owned by Oracle. It's a bad
company which changes the rules of the game during the game. Look at
what happened with java it was free until it starts to be under paid
licence. And there is nothing zfs brings that doesn't exist on other
file systems.

>    Hard to go wrong with EXT4, esp on a 'home system'.

Exactly.

>    However some ZFS features might be useful in a
>    larger, biz, environment. Lots of people love
>    the 'snapshot' feature - kind of an easy backup.
>
>    I've fooled with ZFS from time to time but the
>    complexity-vs-gain equation never seemed to
>    justify it. Now if you had 500 concurrent
>    users ......... ?

If you want snapshots, you have btrfs. If you want really big
environments you have cephfs. So zfs is useless and to be avoided.

-- 
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io