Message-ID: <67a28066@news.ausics.net>
From: not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev)
Subject: Re: M$ 365 Down, Again
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
References: <PPqcnbhZjMZRSQf6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <h-ydnfsQkJD1xAb6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <vnfm5a$2tl1t$1@dont-email.me> <2d7ff7c3-5aa6-acff-bf69-8aee193ce9ac@example.net> <b53v6lxjp9.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <e390e74e-e7e4-b4fb-b8de-2cf67e449ef0@example.net> <m05phjFfqe7U6@mid.individual.net> <38799da0-b66c-ef55-675c-b1b1068c4452@example.net> <s7l17lxehq.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <m07bihFnopbU2@mid.individual.net> <c1vnP.1215252$EYNf.437821@fx11.iad> <slrnvpt1lt.1bfl5.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> <b9661fdd-285e-ba5c-0633-98e9519bef2b@example.net> <sv2dnWWcrPuQtz36nZ2dnZfqn_QAAAAA@earthlink.com> <fbbc4315-8fa9-9348-b5e7-2d7651bab364@example.net> <iCmdnVNZXNxYGzz6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com> <12f8009a-b8a0-9f85-ba66-508512e93ab4@example.net>
User-Agent: tin/2.0.1-20111224 ("Achenvoir") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.31 (i586))
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.ausics.net
Date: 5 Feb 2025 07:02:30 +1000
Organization: Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net
Lines: 22
X-Complaints: abuse@ausics.net
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.bbs.nz!news.ausics.net!not-for-mail
Bytes: 2094

D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>  Zeps are technically "better", but the framework
>>  is subject to stress and can snap - even if it
>>  was upgraded to titanium. Blimps spread the load
>>  across the entire envelope and can thus survive
>>  sudden wind gusts better. They may kinda fold
>>  and shimmy, but don't snap.
>>
>>  Hmmmm ... maybe a 'hybrid' is possible now -
>>  a blimp, but 'stiffened' a bit with like
>>  graphite ribs so it's not SO floppy ?
> 
> I heard about an experimental concept that does not use a gas for lift, 
> but vacuum! Very fascinating!

More theoretical than experimental - the materials might be
possible but I don't think anyone can make them yet.

-- 
__          __
#_ < |\| |< _#