| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<67c2e713$0$11432$426a74cc@news.free.fr> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!cleanfeed4-a.proxad.net!nnrp2-1.free.fr!not-for-mail Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The CMBR Disproves the Big Bang. From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) Reply-To: jjlxa31@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder) Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 11:53:07 +0100 References: <582d81a086d369cf0cd2e78d401de6ec@www.novabbs.com> <vparjj$3ints$1@dont-email.me> <cc6c5a5e40eb4f771dd12ce7ee558f16@www.novabbs.com> <4e287200afacf83d6a0412238f3e180a@www.novabbs.com> <vpf8kq$h0b0$3@dont-email.me> <vpg9a8$mn2j$1@dont-email.me> <67bdc531$0$28081$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <pkOdnbcj05T3dCL6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <67c1a0fb$1$11446$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <gLidnUciq9CDaVz6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> Organization: De Ster Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6) Lines: 70 Message-ID: <67c2e713$0$11432$426a74cc@news.free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Date: 01 Mar 2025 11:53:07 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.10.137.58 X-Trace: 1740826387 news-1.free.fr 11432 213.10.137.58:53976 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Bytes: 3042 Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/28/2025 03:41 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On 02/25/2025 05:27 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote: > >>> guido wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Op 23/02/2025 om 14:46 schreef Paul.B.Andersen: > >>>>> Den 22.02.2025 20:18, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen: > >>>>>> The velocity-distance relation fails to explain the redshift distance > >>>>>> relation because the latter is exactly the same in every direction so > >>>>>> the former would place us at exactly the center of the universe. > >>>>> > >>>>> Do you still not understand that we are in the exact centre of > >>>>> the observable universe? > >>>> > >>>> He doesn't understand yet the relatitivity of the centre of the universe ;) > >>>> (even at big bang an infinite universe is still a possibility) > >>> > >>> > >>> Here is Piet Hein's take on it > >>> > >>> > >>> THE CENTRAL POINT > >>> A philosophistry > >>> > >>> I am the Universe's Centre. > >>> No subtle sceptics can confound me; > >>> for how can other viewpoints enter, > >>> when all the rest is all around me? > >>> > >>> > >>> Hard to argue with that, > >>> > >>> Jan > >>> > >> > >> "I know a girl called Trampoline, ...". > >> > >> is a line from a song with these lines: > >> > >> "When I was three / > >> I thought the world revolved around me / > >> I was wrong." > >> > >> Infant > > > > Piet Hein is never wrong, > > > > Jan > > > > In his own little world That is not an answer. (except perhaps in your little world) > Us stronger mathematical platonists have > a bit more thorough grounding where > we're all right. > > And not "not even wrong". Platonism has no relation with reality. If it has, it is no longer Platonism, Jan