Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<67c2e713$0$11432$426a74cc@news.free.fr>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!cleanfeed4-a.proxad.net!nnrp2-1.free.fr!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The CMBR Disproves the Big Bang.
From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Reply-To: jjlxa31@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 11:53:07 +0100
References: <582d81a086d369cf0cd2e78d401de6ec@www.novabbs.com> <vparjj$3ints$1@dont-email.me> <cc6c5a5e40eb4f771dd12ce7ee558f16@www.novabbs.com> <4e287200afacf83d6a0412238f3e180a@www.novabbs.com> <vpf8kq$h0b0$3@dont-email.me> <vpg9a8$mn2j$1@dont-email.me> <67bdc531$0$28081$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <pkOdnbcj05T3dCL6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <67c1a0fb$1$11446$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <gLidnUciq9CDaVz6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>
Organization: De Ster
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <67c2e713$0$11432$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 01 Mar 2025 11:53:07 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.10.137.58
X-Trace: 1740826387 news-1.free.fr 11432 213.10.137.58:53976
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Bytes: 3042

Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 02/28/2025 03:41 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> > Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 02/25/2025 05:27 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> >>> guido wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Op 23/02/2025 om 14:46 schreef Paul.B.Andersen:
> >>>>> Den 22.02.2025 20:18, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
> >>>>>> The velocity-distance relation fails to explain the redshift distance
> >>>>>> relation because the latter is exactly the same in every direction so
> >>>>>> the former would place us at exactly the center of the universe.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Do you still not understand that we are in the exact centre of
> >>>>> the observable universe?
> >>>>
> >>>> He doesn't understand yet the relatitivity of the centre of the universe
;)
> >>>> (even at big bang an infinite universe is still a possibility)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Here is Piet Hein's take on it
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> THE CENTRAL POINT
> >>> A philosophistry
> >>>
> >>> I am the Universe's Centre.
> >>> No subtle sceptics can confound me;
> >>> for how can other viewpoints enter,
> >>> when all the rest is all around me?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hard to argue with that,
> >>>
> >>> Jan
> >>>
> >>
> >> "I know a girl called Trampoline, ...".
> >>
> >> is a line from a song with these lines:
> >>
> >> "When I was three /
> >> I thought the world revolved around me /
> >> I was wrong."
> >>
> >> Infant
> >
> > Piet Hein is never wrong,
> >
> > Jan
> >
> 
> In his own little world

That is not an answer.
(except perhaps in your little world)

> Us stronger mathematical platonists have
> a bit more thorough grounding where
> we're all right.
> 
> And not "not even wrong".

Platonism has no relation with reality.
If it has, it is no longer Platonism,

Jan