Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed2-b.proxad.net!nnrp1-1.free.fr!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: =?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane?= CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr>
Subject: Re: Linux 6.13.7
References: <m3g7nmF8c6U2@mid.individual.net>
 <pan$8fd2b$a5770044$4f09f4b5$b7990b83@linux.rocks>
 <m3hu3iF3jc9U2@mid.individual.net>
 <182ca48b6c299c15$32886$5317$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
Organization: Mulots' Killer
User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 14 Mar 2025 20:01:53 GMT
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <67d48b31$0$5210$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Mar 2025 21:01:53 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.201.248.7
X-Trace: 1741982513 news-1.free.fr 5210 78.201.248.7:38994
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Bytes: 2108

Le 14-03-2025, Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> a écrit :
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 05:45:22 +0000, vallor wrote:
>
>> 
>> Meanwhile, my NVMe devices are much, much faster than
>> your spinning rust archaisms.
>
> That is quite irrelevant.

Of course it's relevant.

> All computation is performed in cache/RAM and the attached drives,
> of whatever kind, play no role.  

You are a true master of spreading your lack of knowledge with an
impressive certainty. Compared with others saying that the vaccine
against covid was designed to kill people, I'd say you are on the same
level.

> Even heavy disk I/O is always buffered in RAM.

Yes, and so, do you understand the meaning of your sentence? Because the
time taken for the I/O to be buffered in RAM is limited by the slowest
device. Which is the hard drive in your case.

> Thus, the gimmicky SSDs are only useful as a badge of technical
> fashion, just like spoilers on a car.

The real scientist would try to test his claims instead of staying in
error. Your claims don't stand the facts.

-- 
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io