Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix6.panix.com!nan.users.panix.com!robomod!not-for-mail
From: noel <deletethis@invalid.lan>
Newsgroups: news.groups.proposals,news.groups
Subject: Re: 3rd RfD: Mass-deletion of moderated groups without a moderator
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 05:46:12 EDT
Organization: Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net
Approved: NGP Approval Key <ngp-approval-key@ngp.big-8.org>
Message-ID: <67d5487e$1@news.ausics.net>
References: <vqq7tf$ehn$1@reader1.panix.com> <vqtir0$2ukis$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqujqc$bid$1@reader1.panix.com> <vquse4$3d1t6$1@dont-email.me>
	<vr1b28$at4$1@reader1.panix.com> <vr1src$1rj2d$1@dont-email.me>
	<vr2bqu$o3d$1@reader1.panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix6.panix.com:166.84.1.6";
	logging-data="950"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
User-Agent: Pan/0.141 (Tarzan's Death; 168b179 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-NGP-Policy: http://www.big-8.org/~ngp
X-NGP-Info-1: Send submissions to              ngp@nan.users.panix.com
X-NGP-Info-2: Send technical/policy queries to ngp-admin@nan.users.panix.com
X-Comment: Moderators do not necessarily agree or disagree with this article.
X-Robomod: STUMP <https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/stump>
X-Spam-Relay-Country: DE AU **
X-Spam-DCC: sonic: mailcrunch3.panix.com 1254; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
Authentication-Results: mail2.panix.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=invalid.lan
Authentication-Results: mail2.panix.com; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=fox.ausics.net
Old-NNTP-Posting-Host: news.ausics.net
X-Complaints: abuse@ausics.net
X-Auth: PGPMoose V2.0 PGP news.groups.proposals
 iEYEARECAAYFAmfVTGQACgkQrPkQbuk9hdsKuQCgzRZKZ04zZM0qn4oQHxAflzT4
 Bu0An2AA5YVewn9bSgpY2dBZrP4BK4Qa
 =crZJ
Bytes: 2262
Lines: 11

On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 19:58:41 -0400, Paul W. Schleck wrote:

> Personally, I think this robo-moderation idea has the risk of being a
> lot of effort for little reward.

I agree with this statement.

It's less work to implement the previous mod flag suggested solution, if 
a server accepts and makes that change, good, if not, so be it.

Cheers