Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us1.netnews.com!not-for-mail
X-Trace: DXC=g72gN6DBTNQ_4YChK]9ALRU5[F2hIijD_7J470dMQQ7[AUDUcSnb?@Y2M\=I?U;kWSPN]4=KWcMQTiWNDKWg;31WEP?S5IYaD:]n_i[Z4@N@IV
X-Complaints-To: support@frugalusenet.com
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:04:55 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: remember covid?
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
References: <0sndtjd9sn34kejho1e0con70oprmjfag8@4ax.com>
 <67d865e5$3$3831$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <brsgtjlqnh64jph85fsmn5tqdfe33o8kf7@4ax.com>
 <67d88cb4$1$849533$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <uu9htjdgcg6b3uvu07m0fnb53v6j729t94@4ax.com>
 <67d8b290$1$3826$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <s2mhtjp0sns5qulth8s7go9f2ln55uv9cu@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: bitrex <user@example.net>
In-Reply-To: <s2mhtjp0sns5qulth8s7go9f2ln55uv9cu@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <67d8f0da$6$5279$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: 1742270682 reader.netnews.com 5279 127.0.0.1:60419

On 3/17/2025 10:21 PM, john larkin wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 19:41:00 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 3/17/2025 7:06 PM, john larkin wrote:
>>
>>>> Perhaps it's just the optics of it looking like the flip was done
>>>> covertly rather than the kind of clearly self-serving flip-flopping
>>>> politicians tend to do out in the open, the latter's a more honest kind
>>>> of lying I guess.
>>>
>>> In electronic design, it's useful to stay confused and change your
>>> mind a lot, in the early design stages. Stagger around the infinite
>>> solution space. But then you have to switch to the brutally
>>> disciplined, make no mistakes implementation mode. Not many people are
>>> comfortable doing both.
>>>
>>> In electronic design, as in hard sciences like math and physics, you
>>> eventually find out if you were right. In the soft and fuzzy studies,
>>> you may never know.
>>>
>>> In the case of covid, it was politically forbidden to insult the
>>> Chinese by suggesting the lab leak idea, even though it was about
>>> 1000:1 the probable origin of the virus. Politics swamped "science."
>>>
>>
>> The bulk of the evidence seems to be from early 2020,
> 
> The bulk of the evidence has been concealed or destroyed by the guilty
> parties.
> 

Do you believe Kristian G. Andersen, David Morens, Fauci et al had some 
evidence highly supportive of the Chinese lab-leak hypothesis, evidence 
which no one else was or is capable of discerning independently?